WE'll have to see what is said about what Paterno knew, and what feedback he got from his higher-ups. Maybe he was told the investigation concluded the allegations were unfoudned, or were a misinterpretation of what went on. You have to judge him by what he knew, not by what we know know. There is a lot of anger now that we know more, but before that anger is directed at any one individual then we need to be sure they are deserving. It's all speculation right now, let it play out before we prepare the gallows. If he DID know what was gogin on then he had a moral duty to make sure it stopped, to follow up if he didn't get good answers, to call the police himself if he was sure. BUT if he got one report of some inappropriate conduct, reported it up and was told; "We investigated, wasnt what to looked like, we dealt with it and it won't happen again." then would it be appropriate for him to still go to the police?