From last year and minus clay being dead now this makes sense. Laertes is the lynchpin, and this one is tricky, because it is Laertes who kills Hamlet in a plot hatched by Claudius. Meanwhile, Bobby has been distancing himself from Jax because of the increasing size of Jax’s ego, but it’s also difficult to see him side with Clay (Claudius). But honestly, the thing that makes Bobby a fit for Laertes is the fact that Laertes is an honorable, humble, and wholesome character, one of the few in Hamlet, and this is also important: Before Laertes kills Hamlet, Hamlet admits that he sees his own cause displayed in Laertes’s actions. In other words, if it is Bobby who takes down Jax, Jax will understand why: Because Jax had transformed into another version of Clay, and he was just as bad for SAMCRO as Clay. Bobby is the one likely capable of convincing Jax of this, and I think it’s exactly what Kurt Sutter will do: Make SAMCRO’s most sympathetic character kill Jax, die at the same time, but in dying, confess that Clay was behind it all. Before Jax dies, he will kill Clay to avenge not only the murder of John Teller, but for being forced to kill Bobby. I suspect it will be guns instead of fencing swords. Bobby will shoot and mortally injure Jax. Jax will shoot return fire and mortally injure Bobby. Bobby will confess as he’s dying. Jax will then kill Clay before he succumbs to his own injuries.