Mark1647545493

I've been using this on my toy cars for years. I can't drive the cars at all with this coverage. I can back them out of the garage and into the driveway and that's it. If you have current tags on the vehicle I recommend leaving liability coverage on it too. If the state sends you a letter requesting proof of insurance you wont have it with just comprehensive coverage. I pay just under $20 for 6 months of coverage for two cars.

nice car. What's the point of the two red stripes on the left fender?

I'm

I've got a generic 25in tv that works great that you can have for free. Located in West Jefferson

I have the stock shifter from my 89 GT you can have Scott.

SO.... What's the point of doing this?

yea Joe, thanks a lot

Thanks again. Everything works and fit great.

microcenter has some good deals on reburb'd TV's right now... http://www.microcenter.com/single_product_results.phtml?product_id=0386497

How much rust does it have? Where are you located?

pm'd

love those 1911's Grips look good on it.

Vince, I'll take it. LMK when and where I can pick it up. also, ABout how tall is it? thanks

that's what the wife said about 40 seconds into it

lol no, probably not. Not sober anyways..

In her defense, the bacon sundae is pretty damn good. It really is just like having breakfast and desert at the same time... lol

is it a 16GB 3GS on AT&T?

I get my 'Totally Awesome' and a generic 'Simple Green' from Family Dollar. $3 for 64oz of Awesome and $5 a gallon for the simple green. I've been using Totally Awesome for years now.

I agree, leave out the scripting and just shows us the tits and guns.

lol welcome to 2009

I expect the judge to have common sense and reason, not knowledge of guns (that would be a plus). I would like to know what the logic was the judge used that led him to the conclusion this lawsuit needs to move forward. Was the judge high on the ridiculously potent weed when this decision was made? I hope Glock countersues and wins too

I'm with ya... What about the judge that's letting it proceed?

http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2012/07/25/paralyzed-cop-suing-glock-after-his-3-year-old-son-shot-him/ California’s Second District Court of Appeal said on Tuesday that a paralyzed Los Angeles police officer, who was shot by his 3-year-old son, could move forward with his lawsuit again gun manufacturer Glock. Enrique Chavez’s lawsuit claimed that the Glock 21 had a light trigger and lacked a grip saftey, both of which could have prevented the shooting. Los Angeles Judge Kevin Brazile dismissed Chavez’s case two years ago, saying that he had failed to show that an alternate gun design would have prevented the shooting. Brazile also said that a police department review of the handgun showed that the advantages outweighed the risk. But earlier this week, the state appeals court ruled 3-0 that the suit could move forward, according to the San Francisco Chronicle. After reviewing evidence presented by Chavez’s lawyers, the court found that a grip safety “would minimize the risk of accidental discharge without undermining performance.” In 2006, Chavez’s son accidentally shot him in the back after the off-duty officer forgot that he had left the loaded .45-caliber pistol under the front seat of this Ford Ranger. The child was not in a safety seat at the time.

Who's to say 'they' don't want this? It sure would give'm more ammo against gun owners.

Fox28 News just reported that the sale was approved