Mensan

yeah, that would suck.

Almost there! All we need is the song title for the second song!

The proof for that will be here if it exists. I don't think the number is that high.

1.She's a Beauty - The Tubes 2. 3. Unkown artist - I don't want to lose your love tonight 4.Billy Ocean - Carribean Queen 5.The Cars - Moving In Stereo Awesome, are these too easy? Should I make the next one harder?

OK so the correct answers so far are: 1. 2. 3. Unkown artist - I don't want to lose your love tonight 4.Billy Ocean - Carribean Queen 5. All other guesses are incorrect.

Looks good. Lose the green shit and LED's. tongue.gif

I thought it would be fun to post snippets of songs and have people try and name the artist and song title. These are all from my personal music collection. They are wav files, so they are pretty large. We will start off with easy ones: One Two Three Four Five

Tim Curry is one of the ugliest men ever.

Wrong. I said I may start a job where I am paid 50k to work 12-20 hours a week. The job also pays housing and auto allowances, as well as quarterly bonuses. All things considered, it would be around 70-80 per year, to start. I never said how much I make now. I don't give a rats ass if you envy my job or not. I also didn't post what I do, or why people would like to have my job. But good job on making assumptions based on very little fact. Bitter much?

It doesn't take a degree for me to know more than you. You can get the same education with a library card.

LMFAO

Actually, it was more specific than that. http://www.csus.edu/org/democrat/media/700-Club-091301-Falwell-'Blame'.mp3

How big?

Read Karl Marx, specificlly the Communist Manifesto. Most people that insult Communism don't understand it. Hourly, salaried, it all depends on what you do. If your salary is based on an hourly rate for a specific period of time, then it can be to your benefit. I may start a job soon where I get a $50K salary (plus a housing/auto allowance) and only work an average of 12-20 hours a week. Sounds okay to me. Just to let everyone know, Education != a better job. I have a high school education, and my job is the envy of many, many people on the board. I do agree that if you are unhappy or not making enough money then you are in the wrong job, or not working enough. That's how I got to where I am; I wasn't handed anything. I also didn't waste my time complaining about the assholes that did.

Right click->view source->search for file extensions

hohoho

LOL fuck you guys.

Because I'm a genius? tongue.gif Gee, I never looked at it from the point of view you projected. Since someone who doesn't even live in this country presented a shockwave file that took an afternoon to make came up with a scenario that is different than what was presented to us by authorities, even though the reasons behind it make no sense, maybe my opinion is swayed. Fuck rational thought. You must be right. Kevin, I KNOW you are smarter than that. I'm not sure about Anthony, though. graemlins/gone.gif

I will start this with "Once upon a time" so you guys get it. Once upon a time, four planes were hijacked.It was September 11, 2002, and there were plans in the making to hijack more planes but they were grounded. Whoever planned this had their shit together. This could not have been done by people who were stupid. Not possible. They had to plan their attack to take place in a very short time span. The terrorists with the planes had to act quickly before they were found out, and shot down by US forces. Now for a bit of background information. Terrorists don't like to put all their eggs in one basket. They like to continue to attack the peole they don't like. Why would a fanatical group waste a missile the same day they inflicted tremedous damage to their enemy when they had many planes at their disposal? That is what would make sense. Not only that but if these guys have misiles, why haven't we found ONE terrorist cell with missiles or descriptions of attacks to take place with missiles? I'm no detective, but I think it's because the idea is fucking stupid. It was a plane.

Are you retarded? Know what? I was in the Persian Gulf under orders from Clinton in 1997/98. Want to know why I was over there? It rhymes with "shooting missiles at a foriegn country." Did you hear about it? NO. Did you need to, or did we need your permission? NO. Let's leave the political arguing to people who make sense and/or spell two syllable (and higher) words correctly. graemlins/thumb.gif

nope, sure didnt. no metal shavings in the tranny, everything was pristine, apparently. i must say, i have nothing but good things to say about byers on the east side. edit: WHOOPS. this is orion posting.

I have performed work in the pentagon, and I am surprised the plane caused as much damage as it did. It would take something that large, and with as much momentum, to cause such devastation to that building. Any pieces of the plane that were left over were most likely taken directly into forensic labs, and that's why we didn't see them. Come on, there are much better buildings to blow up than the pentagon; the terrorists just didn't do their research. Even a domestic terrorist, if you believe that's what this was, would be smarter than that. Also, a cruise missile explodes outside of it's target to induce the most amount of outward damage, similar to a torpedo. Whatever hit the pentagon burned more than exploded. If it were a missile, there would be much more chaos outside of the building. Our weapons work very well, and would have caused more extensive damage. Not to mention the idea of anything else seems idiotic.

Isn't it Connecticut?

Yeah, good idea, attack China. graemlins/wtf.gif

Or does it?