And here is a very good point:
I never made mention of a particular make or engine. I just would like to know why we are so stuck on pushrod engines.
Once again, arguments are flawed.
Nitrousbird, didn't you just create a thread on how much rotaries suck? And now you are saying that what makes an engine better is how much power it makes in comparison to its physical size? Pick one, because those statements are contrary.
Also, if torque is what matters then why aren't you guys arguing in favor of inline engines? How many of you run inline 8 cylinders when its obvious that they would make a shitload of torque? What about diesel engines? They make FAR more torque than gasoline engines. If that is what matters then why don't we see any of you running them?
The 1968 427 pushrod engine made 390 BHP. The same engine in SOHC form made 657 BHP from the factory. It weighed in at 5 pounds more than its pushrod counterpart.
427 info