RedRocket1647545505

It's still a semi automatic. It's a stupid law. It won't do anything. And criminals won't give a shit anyways. Feel-good legislation is just that. Should we be banning Jerry Miculek's finger as well? That dude can outrun any bumpstock equipped rifle AND do it accurately.

I can get behind that.

I'm glad I'm not the only one who felt this way about BP. It's been reviewed as pretty much the best MCU movie ever. I read something today that the Golden Jaguar was the best villain in any of the MCU movies. WTF? It was good, but it wasn't THAT good. A:IW> all so far. Thor Ragnarok was freaking awesome as well, IMO. Regardless, I geek out and pretty much like all of them.

Who made it?

Loved it. Will be seeing it again in theaters. I was slightly disappointed that they didn't show the destruction of Nova Prime.

???

49? What a short life.

Pretty much. :fuckyeah:

PWS T-3 action + KIDD trigger + suppressor = sexors

Auto bolt release >>>>>>>>>>>>>anything else

Sig used to be great, then the designer that ruined Kimber went to work for them, ruined them for a bit, but now I think they're starting to improve again. Offering all of their carry guns in every flavor of the rainbow drives me nuts. Function >>>>>Form But that isn't usually what sells; pretty colors and tacky names do.

Anyone else been laughing at this shit show?

First off, it's no secret that an eventual ban on all firearms is the end goal. Nobody is being coy in trying to hide that. So we are essentially comparing a ban to a ban. Seems pretty logical to me. Now, being that I work in the 4th busiest high acuity intensive care unit in the entire country, I've seen more death than either you or your statistics can possibly imagine. I see what contributes to the deaths of people on a daily basis. Go read that in a study somewhere if it makes you feel educated on the subject. I also can't help but think that the proposed goal (though I think the gun control crowd really doesn't give an actual shit about) is to decrease the loss of life. If that's truly your goal as you guys claim it is, then alcohol is well within the realm of discussion. What purpose does alcohol serve? What possible benefit is there to society from it? I just had a good friend die of alcoholic cirrhosis. What good did it do him? I see the amount of trauma patients come thru the door that have alcohol in their systems. I'd wager its 2 out of every 3 that roll in our unit. It causes a severe increase in financial burden on our healthcare system, not to mention the loss of life it contributes to. Far more than firearms. So why can't we discuss it? Making a person wait until they are 21 doesn't seem to do a damn thing. You can have all the regulation, decline of alcoholism, community changes, etc. that you want; it still kills a fuck ton of people as well as drives up our cost of healthcare. Are you at a point in regulation with alcohol that the amount of deaths and injuries we incur because of it are acceptable to you? I think it's a valid question. That said, I rarely drink and couldn't care less if I never did again. Still, I wouldn't be for prohibition of alcohol because, again, I feel it falls back to personal responsibility. Same goes for firearms. I just don't get why the gun control crowd wouldn't be for further regulation of alcohol as well if their intentions truly are to save lives. *I'm just picking on alcohol because I see so much of the damage it causes. I could pick any number of things that contribute to human loss of life and go after it just the same.*

Would the anti gun folks be for prohibition of alcohol again? Just curious.

Sounds like, you've been Thunderstruck.

Then why did Obama never commit to the research anyways, so he had some ammo (see what I did there...) to get it repealed? Seems to me he could have very easily directed the CDC to proceed with the research so he could then go to Congress and the Public with it's findings, like, "Look at all this data on gun violence!!! Now repeal the Dickey Amendment so we can pass some Common Sense/Meaningful/Progressive gun control!!!!!!" Me thinks they know what the research would end up showing (fucking nothing), so they'd rather bitch about it and blame Conservatives and law abiding gun owners. So basically, you've been mouthing off since you've been here that the Dickey Amendment was barring us from doing any research on gun violence (because of the big bad NRA :dumb: ) when in fact that isn't the case at all. They can do it, they just don't. Color me fucking surprised.

The Navy also released a recent image of some such UFO (Unidentified Floating Object): I personally think they're already here, stealing all our waters. They're creating global warming in order to melt our ice caps, so they can steal it all.

I feel like they should have brought the snow plows out to fuck up the pavement some more.

Racist :gabe:

Probably because they've been massively overpaid for the past decade. Well, at least the union-driven ones have been.

I will never understand why these boys ruin a good thing. Idiots.

I'd agree with that assessment. Same goes for the rest of Congress. While we're at it, take away their armed security.

I'm convinced he has dementia.

:confused: BTW, Dicks pulled this same stunt a few years back and went right back to selling the same shit again, as I imagine they will do once the heat is off. Regardless, I think they should be able to do as they please even if I think they're a bunch of hypocrites in doing so.

No question. The AR-15 is the most popular rifle because it's essentially America's rifle. Go to Russia, you'll find the AK47 is theirs. Go to Belgium, you'll find the FAL is theirs. And so on. Just because it's popular doesn't mean its the only one out there.