Dr. Pomade

I just LOL'ed.

Congratulations guys - impressive times/traps.

This guy is absolutely right; my sentiments exactly.

1. This guy. 2. 1986 Econo van. 3. A clown suit. 4. Candy. 5. A minor. 6. ???? 7. An Amber Alert.

I'd rock another one for sure - I beat the hell out of my 03 Cobra (e.g., spraying it out of the hole, through five gears, over and over) and it barely even winced. Seriously, I couldn't believe the abuse it took, and, bang-for-the-buck, there wasn't much that could touch it.

03 Cobras rule the world.

I'd hit it.

I would make that trade in a heartbeat.

Great thread, Scott. Bookmarked; will definitely read again.

Some guy punting a kitten over a laundry basket. Not very funny at all.

Because I don't like cops and I don't like people who look like cops.

I once won a girl in a street race.

LOL, it was just an amusing misuse/misspelling of words on your part. You meant to use "blackmail," but instead used "blackmale" (i.e., denoting an African American man as opposed to a form of extortion). Given the topic of this thread (i.e., some naked guy), that untimely misuse/misspelling of words was deliciously ironic.

I'm there right now.

What kind of Freudian slip just happened here?

Wow, wish I could have that click back.

Ownage rating of 97.

Like a fart in a windstorm?

It missed the fan?

When you see it, you'll shit bricks?

I'm not sure about baseball cards, but I'm certain you posted this in the correct forum.

I'm far from well versed in sobriety checkpoint law/statutes, but I believe that they have circumvented many of the challenges to the constitutionality of the sobriety checkpoints by giving "advanced warnings" of the dates of the checkpoints and their anticipated locations in the local media (e.g., in the Dispatch, through local T.V. news broadcasts) a day or so in advance. So, while I agree with your assertion that sobriety checkpoints have been successfully argued as unconstitutional as well as your assertion that they must be carried out in accordance with specific guidelines, I believe law enforcement can, by way of their "advanced warnings," use sobriety checkpoints as a way of circumventing illegal search and seizure. Of course, there's nothing preventing any of us from claiming that police violating our constitutional right against illegal search and seizure, I'm just saying that, from what I understand, law enforcement has used the "advanced warnings" tactic as a preemptive defense against such accusations.

Don't break the law if you don't want to be caught doing something illegal.

Okay.

British girls' accents > * Good find, Ben.