Here is the difference I see. Being pro-life should not be offensive to anyone at all. If you are offended by a commercial that essentially pleads for the protection of the unborn there is something wrong with you. Protecting the unborn is should be just fine with the pro-choice crowd since they are all about "choice". But that is were the problem lies, they are not concerned with choice at all, they are focused on providing as many abortions per per as they can squeeze through the doors.
IMHO any doctor that performs those should loose their license to practice permanently. First do no harm has been a tenet of medicine for a long time, and that practice directly conflicts with the goal of not causing harm. In cases of capital punishment Physicians do not participate in the administration of the drugs, they only confirm the death.
The same liberal people that rush to the cause of every death row inmate in attempt to spare their life, are the ones walking escort for the women to go into the clinic to put to death a baby. The moral contradiction is extraordinary.
Being a sodomite can be offensive to the majority of people who see the moral and ethical problems with it. Forcing counter culture onto children by way of the television has been the method preferred by the sodomites since the "Roseanne kiss" in 1994. That was the official start of the pervasive gay content on the non cable channels. I just don't see the good in convincing children that living gay is ok.