See above. Please be more specific so I can actually try to formulate a rebuttal.
We are not strictly speaking of religious institutions, we are speaking of any employer who decides to impose his morality on his employees. Now I've yet to state my personal position, just asked absolutely valid questions, as they pertain to the possible abuse of opening such a Pandoras box. If you allow institutions, religious in funding or otherwise, to dictate what coverage they provide (negotiated with their provider or providers) via ala carte selection of coverages, based solely on the employers superstitious beliefs, the doors are open for just about any discrimination you can imagine, as religion is completely intangible. Should we have such freedom? Well yes, but that conversation would be way longer than a BC thread.
Also while I would rather pay for a pill than a pregnancy/abortion/welfare check, I would rather the system not set up a Pavlovian response to popping out babies in the first place.