I totally agree. My point is that the OP said this was supposed to 'change', implying that Obama was going back on his word. And yes, maybe it's splitting hairs in a sense, but this is clearly two different techniques we're talking about. Yes...both are shitty if you ask me, but did Obama specifically go back on his 'word'? I don't see where this is the case..and if it exists please, someone, prove me wrong. I like to deal with facts..not half-truths.