Jump to content

Disclaimer

Members
  • Posts

    15,452
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    32

Posts posted by Disclaimer

  1. What about freecreditscore.com? They advertise you get your score

    Anyone that is dumb enough to get to the end of something "free" and then provide their credit card or checking account number deserves what they get.:rolleyes:

  2. There are quite a few "what gun is the best" threads on here. Browse the firearms section and you should find some good info.

    And I was just saying the other day about how we need another "What's your opinion on guns" thread :eek:

    I wish I had a better opinion, but I can only opine on what the best oil, tires, motorcycles, and women are...

  3. We've had threads on this before. Regardless, I followed the engine development program for this bike, then was a little disappointed when I saw the kind of bike they were throwing it into... I hope the come out with a naked sport (a la Z1000, Street triple), or full on supersport with that engine.

  4. The "juice" has never once been turned off on the server.

    PS: It's up to - Most users ever online was 615, Today at 12:34 PM.

    What timeframe constitutes online? I had a record number online on the phpBB3 I run (20), until I figured out I had it set for 30 minutes after signon/logoff, I changed it to 5 minutes and never expect to hit that record again.

  5. For the regional monopoly they do get, the tax rate should be higher than 33%... just saying.

    I'm still undecided.

    I don't think the debate is "something better than nothing"

    The debate is whether a 'flawed' policy should be implemented in the first place.

    It's not fair to the casino owners to decide 3 years down the road to increase their tax rate because someone over/underestimated some figures.

    I'd rather start high and move to low, than try to work the other way. I bet even at a 50% tax rate it'd still be profitable to own/operate a casino.

    As it's been said...some casino profit is better than no casino profit, eh? :p

    50/50 still wouldn't be a bad split for an owner.

    Make it a bidding process. Start at 50%, and if no one agrees to build one, lower it to 45%, and two guys might jump at the opportunity. Then, they're set at 45% rate. Then the rest of the casino owners can get no better rate than 45%. Unless it's put to a vote again.

    Someone will cave and bite at a higher rate because the 'first mover' opportunity is a premium.

    Gov. Kasich says taxpayers got bad deal with casinos

    I was Jussayin... :p

×
×
  • Create New...