magley64

not if your HOA has a clause against flags...

afraid of water?

no... rear brake is good. and yes if you were able to keep the front suspension from compressing, your CG would stay further back, allowing the rear brake to do more.

hate them or not... if you sign it, you should abide by it.

not sure exactly where, but i'll either be on 2, or in the party animal.

flag's almost as ignorant as the confederate flag.... you're in ohio assholes, can't get much farther north without jumping in the effing lake, or speaking french.

I disagree, the logic is flawed, but this wouldn't lengthen the stopping distance at all... a bigger rear brake (more stopping power @ rear wheel) would have done precisely dick. the reason IS weight distrobution, now if the CG of the bike were further back, and lower, then the rear brakes would have done more of the stopping, and the bike designers would have made the rear brakes more robust to compensate. but because the CG is so high, and so far forward, you must rely on your front brakes to do most of your stopping, and the rear only so crub off a little speed before it loses contact with the pavement.

good talking to you, too man.

Here

time?

I've seen it, totally fcking retarded idea... here, let me ram my front wheel up your ass

where is everyone going? valleyview, mentor, austintown? anyone planning an appearance anywhere?

happy birthday

i think you meant braking.... sounds like you did it right, Jam both, and squeeze til your back end starts to come off, and hold til you stop.

so arial photos are showing a total of < 100,000 glen beck claimed a total of > 500,000 us. rep Michelle Bachmann is touting a total of > 1,000,000 am I the only one who thinks 1 is too many? http://news.yahoo.com/s/yblog_upshot/20100830/cm_yblog_upshot/glenn-beck-rally-sparks-debate-over-crowd-size

saw a tool on a gsxr riding through town talking on a cell phone. we got stopped at the same red light, and at least during the red light, I guarantee he couldn't continue his conversation over the volume of my exhaust, and stereo.

both... you've defined yourself by buying and customizing what you choose. it defines you in return, cause you're the type of person who bought what you bought.

haha, i seen a bunch of newbs when i was out riding today, too 2 guys on brand new harleys, matching vests, pull up to a stop sign. Both stall out the engine by dumping the clutch too hard so i just went around while they were restarting.

I get that, your perogative bobby brown, I'm saying the helmet will more likely keep you from vegging rather than cause you to veg.

obviously you missed my point...

you do know you're more likely to be a veg because of NOT wearing a helmet than because of wearing one....right? fft

i think this point gets stronger as the rider gets older, the oldies don't bounce back like they used to, and a minor crash is probably going to cost them either way.

Another point... Notice those who wear vests and sunglasses while riding, are usually the most adamant about "loud pipes save lives"? no, Helmets and gear saves lives, loud pipes annoy people.

Interesting that dude talking about boats again

sell her