redkow97 Posted November 17, 2015 Report Share Posted November 17, 2015 http://www.motorcycledaily.com/2015/11/suzuki-brings-back-the-sv650-with-more-power-and-less-weight/ New frame and updated engine. They're claiming 15 lbs. weight reduction, while increasing power (didn't say by how much) and efficiency. The presser only shows a naked model with ABS and standard forks. I'm wondering if they won't introduce a fully-faired "S" or "F" or "R" model with inverted forks and an upgraded shock at some point - they acknowledge several times that it's a club racing favorite... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
redkow97 Posted November 17, 2015 Author Report Share Posted November 17, 2015 Here's Suzuki's PDF sales sheet http://www.motorcycledaily.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/2017-Suzuki-SV650.pdf They claim 75hp from the new model (at least that's what the internet tells me 56 kilowatts converts too...) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tpoppa Posted November 17, 2015 Report Share Posted November 17, 2015 The frame looks a lot like the Gladius frame. The styling looks similar to the 2003 SV650. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
what Posted November 17, 2015 Report Share Posted November 17, 2015 awesome. now someone buy mine. ;p Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ScubaCinci Posted November 17, 2015 Report Share Posted November 17, 2015 It needs some sort of fairing...even if it's a small one. I'm not a fan of the bare round headlight look. I'm sure the engine is great. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
motocat12 Posted November 17, 2015 Report Share Posted November 17, 2015 (edited) Chingrish?Thanks to its V-twin engine, the seat and fuel tank meet slim, it makes feet reach easier Looks like a gladius with a 650N light, the rad shrouds+ passenger pegs removed and a bandit tail to me Max torque bumped to higher revsMax torque 2017- 64Nm / 8100rpm 2015- 64Nm / 6400rpm 2009 - 64.0 N·m) @ 7000 rpm They still haven't improved over the gen 2 bike yet Edited November 17, 2015 by motocat12 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tpoppa Posted November 17, 2015 Report Share Posted November 17, 2015 ^^ The Gladius motor was an improvement over the 1st or 2nd SV. Peak power wasn't that different, but the power delivery was much improved. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pokey Posted November 17, 2015 Report Share Posted November 17, 2015 Same crap suspension.......come on Suzuki you can do better than this. One of the most popular bikes of all time and you brought it back, I have a feeling it would sell like hotcakes even if the price was increased due to better suspension. That engine is a gem, an even better improvement on one of the very best ever made. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
redkow97 Posted November 18, 2015 Author Report Share Posted November 18, 2015 Same crap suspension.......come on Suzuki you can do better than this. One of the most popular bikes of all time and you brought it back, I have a feeling it would sell like hotcakes even if the price was increased due to better suspension. That engine is a gem, an even better improvement on one of the very best ever made.Watch them come out with an "R" model like I suggested. Gotta leave something for 2018 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryan_c_F Posted November 18, 2015 Report Share Posted November 18, 2015 Thinner is better for newer/smaller riders. Having shaved the width of the tank without losing capacity was a smart move, I think. ABS will appeal to people. 75hp isn't gonna make heads turn, but it's more than enough in capable hands. Looks like a good all-rounder to begin personalizing. If you want a commuter, you're just about set. Want a canyon carver, call RT or Ohlins and get that sorted. Track bike prep is minimal, save for the suspension..but isn't that pretty typical for track conversions? Track day vs track bike, I mean.Personally, I think the 2nd gen is the best version of this bike. I liked the creases and blocked alloy frame against the round headlight. Bulbish body lines and a round light just look frumpy. Not sure how Ducati pulled it off with the Monster, but it doesn't work here. They were saying over 70mpg on this too.That's reaaalllyy impressive economy, almost double what my FZ1 gets. IF MSRP comes in at $5100 like the reddit link I saw was claiming, that's a direct shot across the bow of the Ninja 250/300 and Yamaha R3 markets. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Josh1234 Posted November 18, 2015 Report Share Posted November 18, 2015 Color scheme matches my gear. Would consider Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bad324 Posted November 18, 2015 Report Share Posted November 18, 2015 70mpg and $5100 msrp? I don't know if I believe either will be reality but damn that would be nice 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wantahertzdonut Posted November 18, 2015 Report Share Posted November 18, 2015 I like it. No idea if I'd run out and buy one since I already own 2, but if an R model shows up I think that would get me in the dealer's door.Sent from my DROID RAZR HD using Tapatalk Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jschaf Posted November 18, 2015 Report Share Posted November 18, 2015 70 mpg, $5,100. Not likely. There are a lot of interesting bikes being introduced but this isn't. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
redkow97 Posted November 18, 2015 Author Report Share Posted November 18, 2015 Is there confirmation that this is the same frame as the gladius? I've never really paid attention to those. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryan_c_F Posted November 19, 2015 Report Share Posted November 19, 2015 (edited) 70 mpg, $5,100. Not likely. There are a lot of interesting bikes being introduced but this isn't.The 70mpg, I discovered, is actually UK gallons. So more like 61mpg US. Still solid. To be specific, promo video claims 3.84L/100km.I guess we'll wait and see on price. Edited November 19, 2015 by Ryan_c_F Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
motocat12 Posted November 19, 2015 Report Share Posted November 19, 2015 DR650 is 6,499. Maybe 5100 was Euros or Lbs too. Steel swinger? I thought it was just a steel welded on subframe. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smccrory Posted November 19, 2015 Report Share Posted November 19, 2015 The 70mpg, I discovered, is actually UK gallons. So more like 61mpg US. Still solid. To be specific, promo video claims 3.84L/100km.I guess we'll wait and see on price. 61 mph would be realistic in actual conditions when ridden with zeal, and possibly a little higher if used as just a casual country roadster on the weekends. I base that on my heavier DL650 with a Gladius engine in it, getting a real-world, measured, lifetime fuel economy of 54 mpg in combined highway, city, country, dirt and gravel riding across OH, WV, PA, VA and MD. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smccrory Posted November 19, 2015 Report Share Posted November 19, 2015 DR650 is 6,499. Maybe 5100 was Euros or Lbs too. Steel swinger? I thought it was just a steel welded on subframe. If Euros, the conversion rate is really good right now. 1 Euro = 1.07 USD plus some market spot, so count on 1.13 or similar. That means 5100 euros are worth about $5800, so probably similar to the DR650 once transfer fees and stuff are added. I'm sill disappointed in the suspension though. I thought 'Zuki might do something to take back the crown from the FZ-07's incursion but it doesn't look like it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.