SpaceGhost Posted February 14, 2007 Report Share Posted February 14, 2007 Saw tis car on BTLS.com. That is a good looking mustang. Anybody know anything about it? http://www.btls.com/pics/2007/021207/vets/8.jpg Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SpaceGhost Posted February 14, 2007 Author Report Share Posted February 14, 2007 found this: http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/Ford-Mustang-RONAELE-450R-2007-RONAELE-450R-SUPERCHARGED-HI-PERF-W-SIDE-PIPES_W0QQitemZ190081481806QQihZ009QQcategoryZ6236QQcmdZViewItem#mainImage Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SPLN SUX Posted February 14, 2007 Report Share Posted February 14, 2007 is there any engine behind all that rice? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SpaceGhost Posted February 14, 2007 Author Report Share Posted February 14, 2007 http://www.ronaelemustang.com/index.cfm They have a 750hp Mustang. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SpaceGhost Posted February 14, 2007 Author Report Share Posted February 14, 2007 is there any engine behind all that rice? Why is that rice, it looks just like the Old Shelby 500s. I don't see a big wing...... Car come 350hp, 450hp, and 550hp Looks overpriced but looks good to me. So a Shelby 500 of old is rice also? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Farkas Posted February 14, 2007 Report Share Posted February 14, 2007 That's probably the only mustang I've seen that looks alright. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Miller Posted February 14, 2007 Report Share Posted February 14, 2007 Why is that rice, it looks just like the Old Shelby 500s. So a Shelby 500 of old is rice also? That is like insulting Eleanor, and that should land you an ass beating. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SpaceGhost Posted February 14, 2007 Author Report Share Posted February 14, 2007 Are you agreeing with me that it looks good or are you agreeing with Nick saying that it is rice. I am confused. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trouble Maker Posted February 14, 2007 Report Share Posted February 14, 2007 Not really digging it. I think it might look a lot better without those big lights in the lower front. I don't like the grill that much, although it's kind of hard to tell on the pictures from Ronaele's website. There's some artifact in the compression format they are using form those pictures. The black grills on that ebay page looks good from those angles but I'd like to see more of a front shot of it. The added side scoops on the rear behind the windows are a little too big for my taste. I think if they stuck out about half as far they would match the lines of the car better, but as they sit they break up that area of the car too much. Really pretty close to being a very good looking car, imho. Just a few things that throw it (way) off for me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skinner Posted February 14, 2007 Report Share Posted February 14, 2007 that looks like the Eleanor body kit. Personally I think it looks good but would look better in a darker cooler. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SpaceGhost Posted February 14, 2007 Author Report Share Posted February 14, 2007 There are all kind of pics on the website: http://www.ronaelemustang.com/images/features/S4300007.JPG Here is the links to the photo gallery: http://www.ronaelemustang.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=category.display&category_id=21 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nicktcfcsb Posted February 15, 2007 Report Share Posted February 15, 2007 I like how its "eleanor" spelled backwards Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
99BlownYellowGT Posted February 15, 2007 Report Share Posted February 15, 2007 I like how its "eleanor" spelled backwards Nice catch!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Hal Posted February 15, 2007 Report Share Posted February 15, 2007 I liked the picture in the first post. The rest of it, I really don't like at all. It looks like they mated a Foose design with every body kit offered currently for the car. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kirks5oh Posted February 15, 2007 Report Share Posted February 15, 2007 not a big fan of the new ones. sadly, my next performance car will probably be a gm. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Miller Posted February 15, 2007 Report Share Posted February 15, 2007 Are you agreeing with me that it looks good or are you agreeing with Nick saying that it is rice. I am confused. I like the car, they tried to render it towards the old gt500 or the mythical "Eleanor" and I like both old and new. I was in-love with that Eleanor style ever since I saw gone in 60 when I was younger. When I'm thirty and rolling in money and bitches I fully intend to own a gt500 replica very similar; and I'm gonna rock it as my street car. Eleanor http://www.dreams-cars.net/images/Galerie/Shelby/Shelby_GT500_Eleanor_1967/Shelby_GT500_Eleanor_1967_02.jpg + 5.0 http://www.mustangv8.com/en2/uploads/newbb/880_4511f55457239.jpg + Turbo = dada da dada daaaaaa, I'm lovin it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skinner Posted February 15, 2007 Report Share Posted February 15, 2007 supersnakes FTW http://www.uniqueperformance.com/supersnakeGT500E.aspx Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dover Posted February 15, 2007 Report Share Posted February 15, 2007 supersnakes FTW http://www.uniqueperformance.com/supersnakeGT500E.aspx that is awsome, but I am at a loss for why would they go with the TKO 5spd and not the new TKO6060 6 speed. I will own one dayyyyyyyyyyyyyyy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
truckin Posted February 15, 2007 Report Share Posted February 15, 2007 That's probably the only mustang I've seen that looks alright. Um okay.......... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Miller Posted February 15, 2007 Report Share Posted February 15, 2007 supersnakes FTW http://www.uniqueperformance.com/supersnakeGT500E.aspx That's real sweet. I would still rather take the build it option because the dolla billz. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SPLN SUX Posted February 16, 2007 Report Share Posted February 16, 2007 Why is that rice, it looks just like the Old Shelby 500s. I don't see a big wing...... Car come 350hp, 450hp, and 550hp Looks overpriced but looks good to me. So a Shelby 500 of old is rice also? Sorry... body kit + plus huge wheels w/ factory size brakes + non functioning body parts + knockoffs = 110% riced out. The new mustang, has a hard enough time being anything other than embarassing, it doesnt need any more help. It was said in the paper the day after it was revealed at the Detroit auto show, and ill say it every day untill i die... the new mustang just shows that Ford has officially run out of ideas. I can dig some of the old Fox-bodies, but the newer ones are just cheap horsepower, the poor mans Corvette ,a white trash Ferrari, and the latest ones dont even have that other than the new GT500. Even still, what little respect I had for Ford based on what theyve done in the past, is pretty much ruined by the bullshit they release today. Which is probably why they give so many large companys factory invoice pricing... to promote sales, becasue on thier own, theyed go bankrupt in a decade. And dont come back with me owning a Ford car, becasue i dont. I own an 03 Volvo, which had its influences with Mitsubishi, not Ford. In 2005, Fomoco and Volvo made their merger. Even still today, the new Volvo cars dont rely on Ford for anything, not parts, not design, not technology. They run mostly with Mazda, borrowing the Mazda3 chassis for the S40. Even though Mazda too is, on paper, part of Fomoco, they too still are not influenced by Ford in there cars. Just my opinon, but as everyone knows, opinions are like assholes, everyone has one. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Miller Posted February 16, 2007 Report Share Posted February 16, 2007 I think that "ricer" is still faster. There is my asshole right thuuuur Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Hal Posted February 16, 2007 Report Share Posted February 16, 2007 ric·er –noun, an implement for ricing potatoes, squash, etc., by pressing them through small holes. (Dictionary.com) Technically speaking, no, it is not rice. ug·ly –adjective, 1. very unattractive or unpleasant to look at; offensive to the sense of beauty; displeasing in appearance. Based on my opinion it is ugly (according to the technical definition). Based on my observations of the quantity of S-197 Mustangs on the street, it is not ugly in stock form. People seem to like it. Before anyone whines, I realize language and definition is based upon the common understanding of the masses. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SpaceGhost Posted February 16, 2007 Author Report Share Posted February 16, 2007 Well fuck call me a ricer, look at the car I drive now and I think that car looks nice. I can admit when I go against the masses. To me that is what a mustang SHOULD look like, not all the fake plastics scoops but the New/Old body style. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SPLN SUX Posted February 17, 2007 Report Share Posted February 17, 2007 Well fuck call me a ricer, look at the car I drive now and I think that car looks nice. I can admit when I go against the masses. To me that is what a mustang SHOULD look like, not all the fake plastics scoops but the New/Old body style. Your car, looks the way it does based on its heritage, thats how the STI rim level is ment to be... its not some extra dealership package that got added to spruce up the factory car. The scoop, fuctional with use of the top mount intercooler, the wing, fuctional to keep the ass end steady on loose surfaces, something that Subaru had in mind for the car when they released it. The only thing i dont really like is the pink STI logo, but like the tacky TypeR badge that Honda used/uses, its an OEM trim package, not a dealership addition. Example: Pontiac StreetFire... its a Sunfire, with a bunch of dealership bull shit to make it look more desirible to the younger crowd, who think that it looks cool. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.