Aesthetic_Influx Posted March 16, 2009 Report Share Posted March 16, 2009 Yeah, it took me about 2 weeks to get activated. I can try to PM you on here when they are having their meets if you want, until you get activated. Definitely let me know. I wouldn't mind meeting some of the local VW crowd. Are you doing your own T-belt change? If not shoot me PM and I'll give you my contact that will save you some $$$ when you get around to doing it. He did my car the first time and I'm getting ready to have him do it again as it's nearly due for another one. That would be GREAT. I'm not doing it myself, and was looking at a local VW/Audi specialist. I'm at 66k now and I hear that 70-80k is when most people do it, but that still makes me a bit nervous being new to VW engines. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aaron Posted March 16, 2009 Report Share Posted March 16, 2009 Definitely let me know. I wouldn't mind meeting some of the local VW crowd. That would be GREAT. I'm not doing it myself, and was looking at a local VW/Audi specialist. I'm at 66k now and I hear that 70-80k is when most people do it, but that still makes me a bit nervous being new to VW engines. From all of the Audi/VW forums I am on, the majority seem to do 70-90k, with a few outliers before and after. DSG service at 40k for me, so my 80k service is going to be EXPENSIVE!!!!! haha Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aesthetic_Influx Posted March 16, 2009 Report Share Posted March 16, 2009 Ah, now that sounds like fun! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AudiOn19s Posted March 16, 2009 Report Share Posted March 16, 2009 Definitely let me know. I wouldn't mind meeting some of the local VW crowd. That would be GREAT. I'm not doing it myself, and was looking at a local VW/Audi specialist. I'm at 66k now and I hear that 70-80k is when most people do it, but that still makes me a bit nervous being new to VW engines. I'll send you his info in the morning. My car was actually done prior to me getting it so it must have been done at <60K. When we tore mine apart to do it at 90K it was apparent that it had already been done once we got things torn open but I went ahead to make sure it had the upgraded tensioner in there. Andy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rustlestiltskin Posted March 17, 2009 Author Report Share Posted March 17, 2009 So anywho, back to GLI's and how 1.8t's got some potential even though I wish it had the 2.0t in it. The only reason why I didn't buy a 2006 n up GLI was that I HATE the new bodystyling. they all look like econoboxs to me and theres very little differentiate in the looks department between a base model jetta and a GLI cept for wheels and a couple little shit. God they're ugly as shit. 2004 GLI>any other yr GLI . Just sucks they had to wait til 2006 to put the 2.0t in them! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Farkas Posted March 17, 2009 Report Share Posted March 17, 2009 the MKV golf/jetta was a huge dissapointment as far as quality concerns too.. so you're not missing out Paul. Andy, I think I know who you're talking about.. pretty sure he doesn't do side jobs anymore. Unless you know of someone else that does the same thing. BTW, if you're talking about timing belt services every 70-90k on the 1.8t, you're crazy. A lot of people run into problems between 55-60k.. I was a nervous wreck at 53K. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aaron Posted March 17, 2009 Report Share Posted March 17, 2009 So anywho, back to GLI's and how 1.8t's got some potential even though I wish it had the 2.0t in it. The only reason why I didn't buy a 2006 n up GLI was that I HATE the new bodystyling. they all look like econoboxs to me and theres very little differentiate in the looks department between a base model jetta and a GLI cept for wheels and a couple little shit. God they're ugly as shit. 2004 GLI>any other yr GLI . Just sucks they had to wait til 2006 to put the 2.0t in them! lol, yeah my wife thinks the same thing. She LOVES the 1.8T GLI's and HATES the new 2.0T GLI's. I personally like both body styles, and up until the recent car value downturns, the MKIV GLI's were extremely expensive considering their mileage and age. Great cars either way, you should post up some pics of yours. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aaron Posted March 17, 2009 Report Share Posted March 17, 2009 the MKV golf/jetta was a huge dissapointment as far as quality concerns too.. so you're not missing out Paul. Please explain these quality concerns you speak of...... I love how the MKIV guys try to act like the MKV isn't a fantastic car. It is the reason the GTI is back on the map in the hot hatch segment. While the MKIV is a nice car, the MKV is better in EVERY way. If you don't think so, start naming things. This isn't a dick measuring contest, but be real. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AudiOn19s Posted March 17, 2009 Report Share Posted March 17, 2009 the MKV golf/jetta was a huge dissapointment as far as quality concerns too.. so you're not missing out Paul. Andy, I think I know who you're talking about.. pretty sure he doesn't do side jobs anymore. Unless you know of someone else that does the same thing. BTW, if you're talking about timing belt services every 70-90k on the 1.8t, you're crazy. A lot of people run into problems between 55-60k.. I was a nervous wreck at 53K. The kid I'm talking about works at Byers. Graduated HS with him and I've known him for some time. I think he's still doing side work but I could be wrong. With the upgraded tensioners 90K should be no problem. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Farkas Posted March 17, 2009 Report Share Posted March 17, 2009 Please explain these quality concerns you speak of...... I love how the MKIV guys try to act like the MKV isn't a fantastic car. It is the reason the GTI is back on the map in the hot hatch segment. While the MKIV is a nice car, the MKV is better in EVERY way. If you don't think so, start naming things. This isn't a dick measuring contest, but be real. Well, personally I like the MKV bodystyle.. In fact, I originally wanted a MKV R32, but they're just so god damn expensive. BUT, VWOA even admitted at VW had fallen short on their expectations of quality on the MKV, specifically on the interior. There's nothing that I was aware of, and I was a bit confused when they said that, but apparently they're stepping up their game big-time with the MKVI. The 2.0T makes some great power in such a small chassis but my only complaint that it was a little bit heavier too, which was opposite of what the GTI/Golf has always stood for. The trend of bulky, overweight GTIs started with the MKIV, and it's easy to agree looking at previous generations. Certainly not a dick measuring contest, I'm an enthusiast for sure, and granted each generation has it's downfalls.. I know what I hate about my MKIV too, so it's nonsense to nit-pick over small things- It always comes down to personal preference in the end. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aaron Posted March 17, 2009 Report Share Posted March 17, 2009 MKIV GTI curb weight is 2900lbs MKV GTI curb weight is 3100lbs While I have heard that VW was unhappy with the quality, it is pretty much accepted as a reason VW produced so there would be a reason to cut the production run short to save cost. The MKV was losing money for VW because it was so expensive to produce, so they cut the production run which wasn't supposed to be replaced for a few more years and moved up the MKVI release to save money. The MKVI is slated for only a 2 or 3 year run until the MKVII can be released as well. It is already in the works even though the MKVI has just been released in europe. It does come down to personal preference, but mostly it comes down to money. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Jones Posted March 17, 2009 Report Share Posted March 17, 2009 Well, personally I like the MKV bodystyle.. In fact, I originally wanted a MKV R32, but they're just so god damn expensive. BUT, VWOA even admitted at VW had fallen short on their expectations of quality on the MKV, specifically on the interior. There's nothing that I was aware of, and I was a bit confused when they said that, but apparently they're stepping up their game big-time with the MKVI. The 2.0T makes some great power in such a small chassis but my only complaint that it was a little bit heavier too, which was opposite of what the GTI/Golf has always stood for. The trend of bulky, overweight GTIs started with the MKIV, and it's easy to agree looking at previous generations. Certainly not a dick measuring contest, I'm an enthusiast for sure, and granted each generation has it's downfalls.. I know what I hate about my MKIV too, so it's nonsense to nit-pick over small things- It always comes down to personal preference in the end. 2.0T > 1.8T That is all. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aesthetic_Influx Posted March 17, 2009 Report Share Posted March 17, 2009 2004 GLI>any other yr GLI. Early 2005 MKIV FTW. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Farkas Posted March 17, 2009 Report Share Posted March 17, 2009 MKIV GTI curb weight is 2900lbs MKV GTI curb weight is 3100lbs While I have heard that VW was unhappy with the quality, it is pretty much accepted as a reason VW produced so there would be a reason to cut the production run short to save cost. The MKV was losing money for VW because it was so expensive to produce, so they cut the production run which wasn't supposed to be replaced for a few more years and moved up the MKVI release to save money. The MKVI is slated for only a 2 or 3 year run until the MKVII can be released as well. It is already in the works even though the MKVI has just been released in europe. It does come down to personal preference, but mostly it comes down to money. :nod: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Jones Posted March 17, 2009 Report Share Posted March 17, 2009 MKIV GTI curb weight is 2900lbs MKV GTI curb weight is 3100lbs While I have heard that VW was unhappy with the quality, it is pretty much accepted as a reason VW produced so there would be a reason to cut the production run short to save cost. The MKV was losing money for VW because it was so expensive to produce, so they cut the production run which wasn't supposed to be replaced for a few more years and moved up the MKVI release to save money. The MKVI is slated for only a 2 or 3 year run until the MKVII can be released as well. It is already in the works even though the MKVI has just been released in europe. It does come down to personal preference, but mostly it comes down to money. The 2.0T MORE than makes up for the 200lb difference. From there it only gets better. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aaron Posted March 17, 2009 Report Share Posted March 17, 2009 The 2.0T MORE than makes up for the 200lb difference. From there it only gets better. The only thing I don't like is the issues with the cam followers. At least it is cheap and easy to replace them, but if the cam itself fails=$$$$ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rustlestiltskin Posted March 17, 2009 Author Report Share Posted March 17, 2009 Early 2005 MKIV FTW. Oh, I know brotato, I got a 2004.5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Jones Posted March 17, 2009 Report Share Posted March 17, 2009 The only thing I don't like is the issues with the cam followers. At least it is cheap and easy to replace them, but if the cam itself fails=$$$$ That is what a warranty is for my friend. And after that, they really aren't all that expensive. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aaron Posted March 17, 2009 Report Share Posted March 17, 2009 That is what a warranty is for my friend. And after that, they really aren't all that expensive. Yep, mine is CPO until 74k with $0 deductible. I think the Audi CPO is 100k with a $50 right? Either way, I have nothing to worry about for 2 years (30k left of warranty) Brakes and suspension are up first though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rustlestiltskin Posted March 17, 2009 Author Report Share Posted March 17, 2009 So how bout I just came accross a killer deal on a gt28turbo w/ manifold and injectors for under $800. I might just scoop it up and let it collect dust til I get the supporting parts for it. what u guys think? OR I can scoop up this K04-20 kit w/o dp for under $400. But, I would need to buy extra parts in order to make it work on my car. decisions decisions. If anything, I'll still get my 3in. dp and APR chip next week and just roll w/ that til summertime but seeing these 2 deals made me think. Wouldn't mind finding a used Peloquin LSD kit also. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Farkas Posted March 17, 2009 Report Share Posted March 17, 2009 So how bout I just came accross a killer deal on a gt28turbo w/ manifold and injectors for under $800. I might just scoop it up and let it collect dust til I get the supporting parts for it. what u guys think? OR I can scoop up this K04-20 kit w/o dp for under $400. But, I would need to buy extra parts in order to make it work on my car. decisions decisions. If anything, I'll still get my 3in. dp and APR chip next week and just roll w/ that til summertime but seeing these 2 deals made me think. Wouldn't mind finding a used Peloquin LSD kit also. IMO, K04-020 kit isn't worth the money and effort.. there's too much you have to change to make it work. GT28 sounds tempting but you'd have to fab everything else up to make it work.. and it's really not such a large turbo. You'd have to put rods in your motor too since they make big torque, fast. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rustlestiltskin Posted March 17, 2009 Author Report Share Posted March 17, 2009 cute car lol cute ws6 IMO, K04-020 kit isn't worth the money and effort.. there's too much you have to change to make it work. GT28 sounds tempting but you'd have to fab everything else up to make it work.. and it's really not such a large turbo. You'd have to put rods in your motor too since they make big torque, fast. Yea, I hear ya. I'll prolly just shoot for getting the most potential out of the stock turbo then go from there. I wanna do it right and get upgraded axles along w/ an lsd down the road so that the power stays put. Got big plans but for now just little boltons will due. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Z06G Posted March 17, 2009 Report Share Posted March 17, 2009 lol cute ws6 Yea, I hear ya. I'll prolly just shoot for getting the most potential out of the stock turbo then go from there. I wanna do it right and get upgraded axles along w/ an lsd down the road so that the power stays put. Got big plans but for now just little boltons will due. cute car Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aaron Posted March 17, 2009 Report Share Posted March 17, 2009 lol cute ws6 Yea, I hear ya. I'll prolly just shoot for getting the most potential out of the stock turbo then go from there. I wanna do it right and get upgraded axles along w/ an lsd down the road so that the power stays put. Got big plans but for now just little boltons will due. I would upgrade everything you want done BEFORE you go BT. Chip DP DV FMIC Short shifter Brakes (at minimum:rotors, pads, fluid and SS lines) Suspension LSD After your wallet recovers, then get into BT territory with something a bit bigger than both of those you stated. I plan on doing brakes at end of summer and suspension in the winter. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rustlestiltskin Posted March 17, 2009 Author Report Share Posted March 17, 2009 I would upgrade everything you want done BEFORE you go BT. Chip DP DV FMIC Short shifter Brakes (at minimum:rotors, pads, fluid and SS lines) Suspension LSD After your wallet recovers, then get into BT territory with something a bit bigger than both of those you stated. I plan on doing brakes at end of summer and suspension in the winter. Well I already got performance wise: APR r1 dv diesel geek short shifter 2.5in. catback k&n filter In next week or 2 I will have: 3in. dp w/ testpipe APR stock,91,93,100octane chip From there i'm coasting til summertime then looking at: LSD's FMIC Then fall/winter time hopefully: Suspension Brakes Let me know what you guys think or what ya feel I should go with first Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.