Political Thread Of Fail And AIDS (Geeto ahead!)

[10phone2]

I know that the patriarchy exists. I know that feminism is necessary literally everywhere. I also know that being in favor of equality means standing against ALL forms of discrimination, including speciesism.

 

What would you call a person who is against racism, but has no problem with sexism? How about a person who claims to be opposed to sexism, but is transphobic? You'd call them hypocrites, wouldn't you? Yeah, well, that's what I call ANYONE who says we should respect the rights of humans while they choose to violate the rights of nonhumans.

 

Oppression doesn't cease to be evil just because you enjoy the taste of it.

 

Well played.

Edited January 23, 2018 by 10phone2

[zeitgeist57]

https://www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2018-01-24/why-it-s-so-exhausting-to-defend-trump

[BStowers023]

It's gotta be exhausting being a liberal too. Constantly changing your narrative to fit your agenda.

[o0n8]

It's gotta be exhausting being a liberal too. Constantly changing your narrative to fit your agenda.

 

Correct. It is harder to put thoughts and concepts together than just regurgitate Fox and Friends.

[Lauren]

https://www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2018-01-24/why-it-s-so-exhausting-to-defend-trump

 

This is a story?? This is the opinion of some butt hurt liberal trying to get attention and deliberately writing falsa information. God I hate these people

[Mallard]

What's there to defend when even the evangelicals say he 'deserves a mulligan' for fucking a porn star while his third wife was at home with their newborn child then later paid her off in exchange for silence.

 

There's no defence necessary when everyone is willing to bend their morals in order to support Trump.

 

Sent from my SM-G925V using Tapatalk

[zeitgeist57]

This is a story?? This is the opinion of some butt hurt liberal trying to get attention and deliberately writing falsa information. God I hate these people

 

It's not a story. It's an Op-Ed piece that I feel - as a former Trump supporter - helps explain why it's so frustrating following him.

 

Trump: "Conversation with Mueller? I'm looking forward to it"

WH Press: "Uhh...the President is NOT inviting a Grand Jury investigation"

[greg1647545532]

Best part of that exchange, "You fight back and, oh, it's obstruction."

 

Maybe he's starting to get it.

[greg1647545532]

Someone needs to start a new thread, this one is broken.

[Geeto67]

It ain't the thread that's broken....

[TTQ B4U]

It's not a story. It's an Op-Ed piece that I feel - as a former Trump supporter - helps explain why it's so frustrating following him.

 

Trump: "Conversation with Mueller? I'm looking forward to it"

WH Press: "Uhh...the President is NOT inviting a Grand Jury investigation"

 

 

He's going to troll and tell everyone he's looking forward to the conversation (which would be stupid to have) and then he said he's going to follow his lawyers direction/advice, which should be to say no and follow that path.

[zeitgeist57]

He's going to troll and tell everyone he's looking forward to the conversation (which would be stupid to have) and then he said he's going to follow his lawyers direction/advice, which should be to say no and follow that path.

 

After he criticized Hillary and Cosby for pleading the 5th Amendment while under oath, now he's going to take the exact same path. #hypocrite #doubletalk

 

 

I agree that it's the correct way to answer Mueller's questions, but Trump acts like he's yelling at a bully to fight in the playground and then he runs behind his daddy when the threat comes his way.

[TTQ B4U]

After he criticized Hillary and Cosby for pleading the 5th Amendment while under oath, now he's going to take the exact same path.

 

you have to learn to ignore that part of the "drama" in Hillary's case though, she's flat out fucking guilty and it's clear. those emails and devices being destroyed tell it all.