Tpoppa

...and unfortunately very misguided. The role of the military is not to blindly follow orders. And much though goes into the orders that are given. Of course their are bad apples in every group.

I am afraid your 'grip' is highly innaccurate. The scary part is that you're convinced you are right.

Have you served?

I don't mind conversations about controversail topics. However a conversation implies some exchange of ideas, perhaps resulting in a gain of knowledge of understanding. I don't know you personally, just the image you project online. Your posts read like an activit that is highly stubborn and convinced you are right. Which is a really annoying combination. Some may agree with you, some may not. It's OK, get over it.

Politics, Religion, Guns...what's next?

He's 17 and it's almost the end of riding season. By spring he might be into something else entirely.

What about these? http://www.dan-moto.com/DM_US/3d-clip-on-50mm-silver-product-357.html They seem to be infinitely adjustable.

According to the comparo I read, the ZX14 seems like a better choice

We can trade bikes, although my 70hp might seem a bit boring in comparison.

Drop it off. They will be properly scrubbed.

I am wanting to ride this weekend, but a few things need to fall into place first.

Proof that sex sells ???

-1

A gun to learn to shoot with and a CCW gun might be 2 different guns. Of the 2 listed the Bersa is a better shooter, the LCP is better for CCW. Most the pocket pistols (LCP, Kel Tec, Bodygaurd) aren't particularly accurate or pleasant to shoot, but will get the job done up close. I would get something that's good to learn on, then worry about CCW later. Bersa (380 or the .22), Walther PK380 (maybe the lowest recoil .380), Neos, Ruger .22/45, etc. are all good choices.

I'm afraid you were wrong...Mormon is the correct answer. http://www.myspace.com/video/sarah/mormons-is-the-correct-answer/195599

^^^ then explain the Cult of Personality http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NzdUy90vTuk

It's super creepy that he is still trying to claim innocense.

Can't tell if kidding... You would also need to remove the whole notion of Jesus being the son of God, immaculate reception, and easter zombie Jesus. Without those elements, I seriously doubt the stroies of Jesus would be around today. You would be left with a role model. There are plenty of role models in history. That's way too philosophical for me anyway...

Interesting. It's a true statement that science cannot prove that God does not exist. You can extend the logic of that arguement to say that science cannot prove that many things don't exist. However, science can prove something unnecessary by proving an alternative. http://abcnews.go.com/GMA/stephen-hawking-science-makes-god-unnecessary/story?id=11571150

I would have been OK with 30 days in General Population.

There is so much bickering among different sects of Christianity (same is true for other religions). According to the chruch I attended as a child, all Catholics are going to hell. Catholics are misguided because they pray to Mary, and Mary is a false god. This isn't some small church in a shack by the river. This is a large, surburban church with a big following.

I have read the entire bible and studied other religions (out of curiouity, not as a member). I think religion, it's origin, and associated beliefs are infinitely fascinating. Religion and even church serve a purpose in society, but I personally don't believe in the existence of any type of god. As a rule, I don't piss on anyones beliefs (except Mormons an Scientologists of course). However, when Christians decide they feel bad for me for not sharing their beliefs, I have no problem pointing out obvious flaws in their superstition.