chevysoldier

You mean right as in correct or right as in right-handed? Meh, doesn't matter, both would be fine.

You using tapatalk right now?

I remember you posting up asking if it'd be a good idea to take him. Glad you did.

Slide Show, more of inside shots than outside. http://www.coshoctontribune.com/article/20111103/NEWS01/111030302/More-than-800-come-pay-respects-visitation-Raymond-Border?odyssey=mod|newswell|img|Frontpage|p

Video up. http://www.coshoctontribune.com/

I'll have to do that. Can't wait to see.

You put in 12% into both healthcare and retirement? Now what about the rest of the public sector? I know a lot that pay 0%.

Bump for the vets that haven't seen it yet.

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

How much do you pay into it? 10%-15% like SB5 would do across the board? Not saying benefits aren't a reason to get into the public sector, but obviously our budget can't handle what we have been trying to do. How many public workers have been laid off because we have no money?

http://biggovernment.com/jhart/2011/10/31/ohios-union-fat-cats-try-to-fool-voters-on-issue-2-public-sector-reform/

How much for health care and retirement? 10%-15%? Not all public sector workers do.

http://biggovernment.com/bytor/2011/10/31/major-ohio-newspapers-look-past-union-hysterics-endorse-issue-2-reforms/

But then the ones that are shitty get let go. They don't get kept because of seniority. Right?

I love potato salad.

I like the tire swing idea.

No one got pics??

Issue 2 will make public employees pay into their healthcare and retirement instead of the tax payers, correct? If they have to pay their own, wouldn't the taxes that don't go to healthcare and retirement anymore be used to hire more police and firefighters, buy equipment, etc? Small reduction in take home pay = more jobs available right? Taking away bargaining for safety equipment isn't even on the table from what I have read. If SB5 stays in place, this will allow the worst teachers/FD/PD to be fired instead of just the low man on the totem pole correct? Collective bargaining forces teachers of the year to be laid off instead of the bad teachers. http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/how-collective-bargaining-forced-milwaukee-fire-teacher-year_553779.html

It says on the site. Hover over the "?" next to "See Condition Details"

"Doesn't matter where you get your appetite, as long as you eat at home."

Ah. Gotcha.

Really what?

Spending your tax dollars to buy his book? Not to mention he profits from that. Its not major money but here we are in debt and this is how our money is spent? Thar doesn't seem the least bit wrong to you?

Does this seem morally wrong to anyone else? http://hotair.com/archives/2011/11/01/rep-schweikert-to-obama-stop-buying-your-own-books-with-taxpayer-money-please/