Scruit

Depends. Do you and 30 midget friends all jump of the ambulance like a clown car? Sent from my DROIDX using Tapatalk 2

Tsk Tsk. Didn't y'all learn from Daniel Tosh last month?

I'm saying the waiver is stupid, easily challenged AND makes EMTs sound like a bunch of untrained gorillas.

The waiver should not be trying to disclaim negligence - it doesn't work against a determined enough plaintiff. The waiver is an Acceptance Of Risk (AOR) and it trying to achieve two things... 1) Getting you to agree that you won't sue them for these specific things that might happen there... and 2) providing proof that you were notified of the specific nature of the risks. Thing is, court, if you push it, will tend to agree that negligence is the exact reason you ARE being sued. That's liek saying; "You can't arrest me for DUI, I'm DRUNK!" If you could disclaim negligence then the EMTs could just wrap a chain around your leg and drag out out of the car with a pickup truck, snapping every bone on the way out, and then you're stiffed. The waiver should say; "Racing is an extremely dangerous sport that includes the risk of injury or death. The track provides emergency medical staff who will act in good faith and to the best of their ability to rescue and treat you if the need arises, however you accept that you may not be in a position to consent to, choose or decline any specific rescue techniques employed. You are still at extreme risk of injury or death despite the best efforts of the Emergency Rescue personnel. Some rescue methods require split-second decisions to be made that could increase some injuries if those actions are required to save your life. This includes, but is not limited to, rib injures during CPR, injuries associated with extrication from a vehicle, or even inability to follow spine support protocols in dire cases such as extrication form a burning vehicle." Don't disclaim negligence - these things are not negligence. Explain why it it is not negligence. My brother is a Paramedic in the UK. I know that EMT/EMS/Paramedics do their best and I don't doubt for a second that they often have to make tough decisions in dealing with dynamic situations. I think characterizing that decision-making process as negligence is a disservice to the EMT/EMS crews.

You can ship to an gun dealer, and they run NICS on the buyer when they come to pick it up. You can't ship to an individual.

Good luck disclaiming negligence. They gonna try disclaiming homicide next? Sent from my DROIDX using Tapatalk 2

Post #269, YOU call HIM emotional. http://www.ohioriders.net/showpost.php?p=882573&postcount=269 Post #270 you accuse him of calling people emotional.http://www.ohioriders.net/showpost.php?p=882575&postcount=270 Dunno how to make it any clearer. Do you need a picture? . This is why people think you are a troll.

Looks from here that YOU are projecting YOUR "emotional" name calling onto HIM.

RE: sell it / keep it - The police will be knocking on his door soon enough. The rifle going missing in the mail will create a bunch of heat on UPS and they will find it.

He could have been arrested and jailed for a long time for just taking it to the police. Calling them was the only way out. The guy who bought the gun is going to figure out it's missing and they will track it down from there. Heck, what are the chances that the gun buyer got a TV in the mail? I have received misdirected shipments in the past where the invoice inside is for someone else. In my cases it was always the vendor who accidentally swapped labels on the box. Got a set of brake lines for an Impala instead of my Bronco that way - invoice for some guy in Florida. Got a box full of nuts and bolts too - I had ordered 200x grade 8 for the bronco frame, got some weird crap intended for some dude in Cali that wasn't mine. In that case the vendor mailed me a shipping label with the Cali guy's address on it. Couple of days later, MY box of fasteners arrived from Cali.

I quit following the argument a while ago. I just thought it was funny you accused him of calling people emotional, and then you called him emotional.

If only it wasn't DC...

Fair enough. Dude, wait, what?

So it came in a box with a gunbroker invoice for another customer, and a UPS label for the guy in the new story on the outside. The only places the mixup could have occurred is where the boxes are near each other. I'd say at UPS. Maybe the UPS guy was responsible for putting mailing labels on boxes and he put the wrong label on a couple of boxes?

http://www.wusa9.com/video/default.aspx?bctid=1777128180001

USA is ahead in medals again. 81 total to 77.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/08/08/man-dog-lake-superior-photo-_n_1755609.html?1344442024&ncid=edlinkusaolp00000009

People post positive reviews here as well as negative. I chose Hoblick's shops for my tires based upon the good reviews here, and I added my good review to that based upon the excellent work he did on my bike.

If you post count is higer than the miles you've done on your bike then GET OUT AND RIDE. I had 7k on my last bike and have 8k on this one.

I heard that Hinds didn't give a rats's ass about it customers. Apparently gave a mouse' ass instead...

That's a lot to take in.

Yes, absolutely and unequivocally. Not one person here has expressed support for your opinion - what does that tell you? You work for IM or know anyone there?

Digging deeper. I suggest you stop before you hit the earth's core. If I were to see a great deal at IM I'd know to beware of being woodbury'd.

That is EXACTLY what they did.

Seriously, I could not DISAGREE more. They took a deposit, the deal is done. They welch, they get called out. Therefore we all benefit when dealers know now to welch on agreed deals for fear of being called out. Simple, no?