cOoTeR

Thanks for posting it guys. I cannot believe Obama really had small children read their letters. This guy is playing towards his stupid, Large audience of followers who would follow him regardless and the emotionally blind. a person in his position should not be trying to excite the masses in this manner. He should be calming and ensuring the masses not pushing retard buttons. Piece of shit this guy is.

Too bad there's no video of the hot chick shooting guns.

Taking a page out of Hitlers book using the children. Repetition of history is kind of scary!

Are said percentages reliable? Or are they put out to calm the people into thinking everything is ok?

Woulda been pretty cool if he rode that out. WTF were they doing that he didn't notice the speed bump.

I've been contemplating slapping those Contis on the Multistrada.

What model are those tires? Do they come in sizes upto 195?

They should at least give the guy the money he protected as severance pay. I mean had he let the guy take it they'd be out the money anyhow. Hell even split it with him.

Mines not a true "AR" its a dpms.

Good luck keeping rubber on the wheels.

I hope so I was planning on getting an ar-15 after we buy a house. But at these prices I'll just make due with the AR-10 I have.

I don't know if they will get back to normal prices any time soon. Pandoras box has been opened and they've realized people will still pay for it. People used to say gas prices will go back to normal. Now we've just raised what we think normal is.

Those tires would look bad ass on my rc.

I don't know if its been suggested but maybe look into a yamaha stratoliner. 1800cc v-twin and way more comfortable than a Harley. You should be able to find an 08 low miles around $7,000 easy. The midnight mon-touring model comes with detachable windshield, sissy bar and saddle bags.

Poor kid. But its obvious we should ban psychology.

I don't have to go over your posts with a fine tooth comb, because you make it so easy with the derp you already spew out. Again, you're changing the conditions of the argument to suit your own ends, which implies that you don't have a leg to stand on and have to manufacture shit in order to form a argument in the first place. If you go to a gun store, attempt to purchase a gun, and you card gets declined, that's probably because YOU DON'T HAVE ANY FUCKING MONEY. This isn't what this thread is about, this is about a bank that saw a massive increase in inflow funds on a business, and put a hold on it to investigate. Yes, it's exacerbated by the fact that whatever guy on the phone told him it was about guns was a moron, but this is something that happens, for better or for worse, all the time and is almost completely automated.

As far as the ATM thing goes, would you rather have someone with your debit card info clean out your entire account, instead of being limited to only $300 a night? If you want to buy a gun that bad, plan the fuck ahead.

Way to mash up 2 different subjects there to fit your argument. The debit card thing was in regards to BOA declining firearms purchases.Try reading the last few posts since my link, take your time and you may be able to figure out what I was talking about. Or maybe even check the link I posted. If you want me to I can map it out for you.

You can't keep pushing none teaching issues off on the schools. We used to teach. Now we teach, feed them, teach them right from wrong, give them healthcare, teach them about the birds and the bees, how to be safe on the internet, the difference between candy and pills.

Really, I work in a school. The list of things we are forced to do that have nothing to do with education is MASSIVE.

I draw the line at a safe environment. If people want a safe environment for their children then get out the checkbook and provide it.

I would certainly carry my weapon if allowed and I would certainly put my life on the line to protect them if need be.

But primary protection is the responsibility of the police, and the taxpayers.

First the police responsibility is to enforce laws which is why several have gotten away from the slogan "to protect and serve". Protection is on security.

Safe environment, just about every schools website lists its mission or goals as "Provide a safe learning environment". Put one armed guard in a school will do nothing against a planned attack except designate the first target. Schools need to reevaluate their lock down plans,.hiding and hoping the shooter doesn't bust the door in does not work. It just makes it easier to count the bodies. Now why not allow staff that would be comfortable to be armed to take training and be ready to protect the class if someone comes in the door to kill them all?

So... we should bury the tach and bounce off the limiter next to the sign in a show of civil disobedience?

Or I think a nice large group ride through the town with a banner that's says NOT WELCOME. Will suffice.

You should shoot bullet holes in that sign.

Yeah, that jumped out at me too. Either the NRA was right and Obama and everyone on the left was being a cock for calling them hysterical for suggesting armed guards, or the "resource officers" are going to be unarmed, which is about as effective as a rape whistle against a spree-killer.

Gotta be one or the other...either stupid or lying.

I don't feel an armed resource officer will necessarily be effective. They will just become the first target. Arm teachers who feel comfortable with doing so.

The problem with the mental health professionals being able to flag people as dangerous that I didn't think of until now is in regards to our troops. When they return they have to talk to mental health professionals about their deployments. Now they are going to talk about killing people and ptsd type stuff. Does that mean now the mental health professional can ruin that soldiers military career by saying he is not safe to own a gun? Will they be able to take his right to owning a gun because he got a little screwed up in the head defending that right? Police departments often have mandatory counseling for officers involved in traumatic events. Will these counselors have the power to take that officers gun rights away because he claimed to be ok with shooting another person or he has nightmares about a car crash he responded to?

They are not getting in the way of anyone rights. You don't have a right to force a company to do business with you. They can refuse the business.

The only recourse you have is if they refuse the business under grounds protected by state or federal anti-discrimination laws (gender, race etc) - but those are laws that target businesses, and "gun owner" is not a discrimination class.

You have a right to buy the firearm, yet you go to the store to buy it and its declined using your debit card without any notice. While it may seem like a minor inconvenience to some that seems to be getting in the way to me. Seems they are doing their best if this is true to prevent people from buying firearms. A person like me I live almost an hour from the nearest gun store and normally only carry a minimal amount of cash. I'd be pretty pissed if one evening I drove an hour to buy a gun and planned on using my debit card and it got declined because of a new policy the bank has. If it was too late to get into my bank for a withdraw then is be SOL because my bank limits the amount that can be withdrawn from the ATM. So they very well could delay someone making a firearms purchase which in my opinion is getting in the way of the persons rights.

I told him that in the Yeager thread. Apparently either he enjoys trolling, or he's a moron.

I'm a troll? Says the guy on a motorcycle forum that no longer has a bike. The same guy who goes over everyone of my posts with a fine tooth comb and jumps on any detail he can. Regarding your statement in the yeager thread. That was in regards to a private business. My rights stop where yours begin. Meaning one person does not have the right to shit on the rights of another. BOA cannot go out and stop people from buying guns although it can regulate where its customers are spending their money if they want to. Doesn't mean its right it just means they have the right to don their business how they want to.

The constitution only limits the actions of the government, not private people/companies.

Violation was the wrong term i guess an infringement or impediment. Yes they are not limited by the constitution but if this situation is true than they are getting in the way of other peoples rights that they have.

I maintain that guy most likely doesn't know anything and used "yes' nervously why looking for information on his screen.

How would BofA know what you are buying? They only know the merchant name, if you bought ammo from WM it shows up as "Walmart $50" not "Walmart ammo $50" on their computers. The only way they'd know is if the merchant was known to be primary a guns/ammo dealer. I bought my 7.62 2 day ago from ammotogo, and a ton of 9mm last week from surplusammo. Why would they let those through?

I wouldn't be surprised if they actually can see what you are purchasing. When you call to dispute an item on your account don't they have the ability to see what was bought?

1) The voice sounds foreign, not US. His use of English seems to be clumsy. In the UK (and other countries) it's common to say "Yes" or "right" while listening to someone, but that is not agreement, that just means; "I heard you". Americans typically don't understand that.

2) I bought several hundred rounds of 7.62 on my BOA card 2 days ago.

So when someone asks "is that true?" The appropriate response is "yes (meaning "i heard you"). Doesn't fit to me.

You're quoting yourself in support of your own argument?

No the threads are related but different enough to not be in the same thread. Wasn't arguing anything there.

Why hasn't anything been put put to disprove these claims?

http://www.ohioriders.net/showthread.php?p=951091#post951091

This here seems like the bank is violating the second amendment rights. Unless when you agree to bank with them they say that they can choose how you use your money.