The reason I ask: The systems GM is producing are still MAF based but MAP and BARO are making up for a larger amount of calculations. There are no "look ups" involved with the E38/E67 platform - everything is calulated real time.
The problem I see is the math involved, mainly linear algebra. There's no good way to simplify the applied/engineering math involved. The course would be mostly a math class. Not sure how well that sits with professionals and enthusiasits.
Here's s a sample from MATLAB (who'd ever thought you'd actually use this program outside of college) of the response curve that's calculated by the parameters that can be configured in the PCM. The data used is 43,000 samples from an 08 vette.
http://img219.imageshack.us/img219/9494/deantrial1ra8.png
X axis is your RPM, Y axis is your "GMVE", or VE% and Z is MAP kPa. You can see the 30 "zones" (each zone looks like a patch on a quilt) without to much trouble.
The nice thing about the function thats used to calculate this data - you can use it ANYTHING with RPM and MAP values. There arer no limits, and no lack of resolution. It is a truely portable solution, whether you have 3 dimensions or 13, the math is the same.
<3 GM
Nate