Jump to content

Aaron

Members
  • Posts

    4,816
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Aaron

  1. I posted the MUSTANG stats. Is that why no lap times have been posted on the Mustang vs Camaro battle? when that is literally all MT and C&D is compare lap times? I tell you what, next time you're on a road course, or autocross, or go to hocking, you give me a call :gabe: Hell, I'll race your modded car in a straight line too.
  2. We can comment on the interesting nature of the Mustang's performance all day long. I'll leave you with this... http://www.caranddriver.com/comparisons/2015-ford-mustang-gt-vs-chevrolet-camaro-ss-1le-dodge-challenger-r-t-scat-pack-final-scoring-performance-data-and-complete-specs-page-5 0-30: 1.9 0-60: 4.5 0-100: 10.4 0-150: 25.4 C&D most recent test vs the 6th Gen SS: 0-30: 1.7 0-60: 4.4 0-100: 10.5 0-150: 29.0 :dumb:
  3. What about the slice in your side mirror?
  4. I was very close to purchasing a 15 STI a few months ago. I could get by the VERY outdated powertrain, and all the stuff we know about that, given it would be new, and have a 5/60k powertrain warranty, and I'd have left that stock. I couldn't get by the gas mileage, and insurance costs. Simply too many compromises in that vehicle for me to pull the trigger. I was only willing to overlook so many downfalls. It wouldn't even have to be at 30mpg, something like 26-28 would be totally fine, and even 350hp in a modern Direct injection engine with a turbo that spools a bit earlier and holds longer, etc. I would be VERY interested in that car.
  5. They're thriving, call back. Do some searching, they closed.
  6. Go try at either of the Byers dealers. Fucking LULZY. Even their WRX's they guard like they're some super car. Gotcha.
  7. I'm very familiar with modern direct injection engines, I simply didn't agree with you, and was looking for clarification. At least in the Audi/VW world, the direct injection 2.0T and 3.0T can and will support 600+hp. They have HPFP upgrades, lpfp upgrades, injector upgrades, etc. I would not consider the subaru 2.5T's lack of modern fueling to be a positive. And the main reason for both direct and port is to prevent carbon build up on the valves. The added fuel is a bonus, but again, it really isn't a limiting factor (direct injection).
  8. You can't even test drive a "regular" sti, at least locally. Not until a "deal" is agreed upon. It's a 35k car, lololol. I'll probably never buy one because of their policy. what does this mean?
  9. Love that car, and the color.
  10. I'm no scholar, but preseason rankings generally happen before the season starts, Jive. :dumb:
  11. I love the playoff though, so much fun to watch this.sport every weekend, it's awesome. It is a direct cause.of me watching and enjoying more college football.
  12. Based on preseason rankings which factors in the past...
  13. That's the funny thing about the SEC. They bank on "history" to get them good rankings each year, then they drop like flies throughout the season. "Quality losses" I get, but when that preseason rank of 6 drops to a 20, the quality certainly reflects reality towards the end, and not the beginning. :fa:
  14. After last year, do you really? Serious question. I get that it's a different team, chemistry, effectiveness, etc, but I'm shocked we dropped.
  15. Until Subaru puts a modern engine in an STI, I'll continue to be an outsider looking in. Nothing excusable about the same old engine, which can get a mere 23mpg on the highway. Hell, high HP V8s can do better than that. Modern i4 turbo cars are into the 30mpg range all day long. Once they do that, it'd be a hard car to ignore.
  16. Seems like very specialized person you're looking for. I wish you luck, sir. Have you thought about simply finding a mobile painter? He can just throw a thin coat of black on the windows at time of fender painting?
  17. I know a guy, but he only responds via PMs to people with F bodies.
  18. Speak for yourself, Genoa Township does...
  19. Cool, glad your breathing some new life into it.
×
×
  • Create New...