I'm sure that argument is all over CR. There are two main camps to performance driving enthusiasts; I call them Neck-Snappers and Side-Loaders.
Neck-Snappers get more enjoyment out of being forced back into their seat upholstery and traveling over the ground like a bullet. Corners, for them, are interruptions between stints of using their right foot to turn gasoline into ground-tearing torque.
Side-Loaders prefer to have their eyeballs fall out their ears and find the longest distance between two points. To them, straightaways are for relaxing, taking a break and pondering the mysteries of life before diving into the next corner and trying to push the track's asphalt into a wider arc.
Both are valid, and it's certainly possible to find both power and handling in a single car. But the differences show when it comes down to which aspect to compromise on. Do you sacrifice power for handling? Or do you put more of your budget into the engine?
The BRZ is a compromise. No one who's looking forward to it will say otherwise. But it's a compromise deeply in favor of handling over power. There are certainly other cars out there in the same price bracket that have more power, but they won't handle like the BRZ. It won't appeal to everyone, and I'm perfectly ok with that.
Does that mean I wouldn't want more power? Of course not. But I don't think it *needs* it either. In a few years I might eyeball the higher powered versions that are sure to come out and see what's available. I think supercharging is a better choice for the BRZ/FR-S platform.