Jump to content

Disclaimer

Members
  • Posts

    15,452
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    32

Everything posted by Disclaimer

  1. You need to add up their points, and figure it out.
  2. How many times do you post a week? It's less than that. :D
  3. How does photos of Shitty's baby juice all over the place on here, NOT constitute abusing the site? Unless.... ooooooo, you must like that you sly dog you. I'm on to your game.
  4. Keep it in the rules, but provide us with examples when it happens. Because if this means I can't keep photoshopping pictures of Shitty spunking on random guys who post their girlfriends pics up here - then we will strike it from the rules.
  5. There are always rules to fucking. Like ass to mouth is only acceptable in the 'heat of the moment'. Sometimes.
  6. Yea, I can't do it with the lack of feedback, I turn ABS and TCS on - plus I like the suggested line. I don't think I could hang w/o those.
  7. IPO (Nut up or Shut Up) Ticker Symbol: NUSU Project Open Price: $3.95-$6.30 per share Volume: 23 Cap: N/A Corporate Description: We challenge people at all aspects of life in and around the Coshocton, OH area. Specializing in twisty roads and sheep molestation, the group is projected to be profitable in Q2 2010 upon the completion of their latest innovation - the cock gobbler combination turkey baster and rear swingarm stand.
  8. Baby, you know I've got the distance, I just don't have the drive.
  9. Ohh, and I totally missed the new rules thread. I'll need to take my unfiltered filthiness somewhere else I suppose. There's a fine line between humor and a lot of those 'infractions' - I don't want to walk that tightrope. <sadface>
  10. Not it! And until the paternity test comes back... I'm maintaining that position. I might even maintain it AFTER it comes back, just to be a dick.
  11. Yea Casper, you didn't read the f*(king memo on that did you? A real man would've rode that shit out side-saddle if necessary. I would totally 'intentionally' lay my bike down for a number of reasons - all self-preservation based, not "too slow down quicker"-based
  12. Are you talking to 'me' Justin? No. I can pretty much assure you that is not one of my aliases on here.
  13. I stand corrected. But he issued the challenge for Laguna Seca... not Monticello.
  14. I think he downed the whole bottle the first day he threw his leg over the liter bike.
  15. Touche. I agree, they should've put Heinricy behind the M3 to be fair. And let Cooper run the CTS-V. But, the challenge was 'run what ya brung'... so it was true to that aspect.
  16. But the bottom line... the CTS-V still wins out. I was worried at first. Chalk it up to the fact that Lutz just isn't as spry for a 77 year old as we thought
  17. So, Fonz.... how did that make you feeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeel?? The smiley doesn't exactly communicate your full feelings. Do you feel that it shouldn't be reported? Do you feel that the terms 'step daughter' and 'oral sex' are too graphic, especially when used in the same sentence? Should we shelter people from the police blotter so they can live in their happy halo away from the big bad world? Your thoughts, let me have them.
  18. Sorry, this was too good not to share. It made international news. This... is awesome. Ya know, when I read articles like this, you start to realize stuff like this happens on a 'more often than you think'-basis. And it makes me wonder how these guys convince these women to do stuff like this... I have a feeling that the guys don't have particularly mad game, so the only alternative (besides dabbling in a little pharmacology) is these women are stupid + horny. Findlay, OH no less http://www.metro.co.uk/weird/article.html?Woman_calls_police_because_daughter_was_better_at_oral_sex&in_article_id=762358&in_page_id=2 I also found the actual page on thecourier. It's about the fifth line down from the header. Comments are.... interesting. Especially seeing the anger in some of the 'holier than thou'-ists http://www.thecourier.com/Issues/2009/Nov/02/ar_news_110209_story9.asp?d=110209_story9,2009,Nov,02&c=n#__comments
  19. Be sure to do some research on the legality of these "tickets"... Some are no more than a bluff just to make you think you need to pay. This site is kind of 'fruity' but it's the first thing that google popped up when I put in 'legality of traffic camera tickets' http://www.highwayrobbery.net/
×
×
  • Create New...