Guest Harris92 Posted November 28, 2004 Report Share Posted November 28, 2004 Both my car and my girlfriends car make more torque than horsepower. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr.COS Posted November 28, 2004 Report Share Posted November 28, 2004 Just about any turbo car can make more torque than horsepower. You did know that didn't you? smile.gif Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crash1647545504 Posted November 28, 2004 Report Share Posted November 28, 2004 Max Power 141.1 @ Max Torque 182.9 on 18:1 AFR smile.gif in the summit. After I got some more fuel to it I hit Neerly 155HP @ 200TQ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Rane Posted November 28, 2004 Report Share Posted November 28, 2004 I think the S-13 redtop has 205hp 203torque :-p Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
excell Posted November 28, 2004 Author Report Share Posted November 28, 2004 Originally posted by Old School Accy: no offence to anyone but this seems like its in the wrong forum. seems more like it should be in the Kitchen You are the only one that has had a problem so far, so shut the fuck up before I do it for you. My intentions for this thread is that I see lots of dyno threads from hopped up imports. Most of them have much more horsepower than torque, which I understand why it is so. However, I wanted to know if any of you produced more torque than horsepower. It just didn't seem like the trend. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crash1647545504 Posted November 28, 2004 Report Share Posted November 28, 2004 not for the summit 1.9 60ft's BIACH Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IPS Mike Posted November 28, 2004 Report Share Posted November 28, 2004 Brett's Z made 365 rwhp and 400 rwtq while near stock with only a couple cheap mods. That was a while ago though, it was making way more then that this past summer... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OGRE Posted November 28, 2004 Report Share Posted November 28, 2004 Originally posted by rl: The new 6.0L powerstrokes. seen a couple dyno graphs of 6.0l around 400rwhp making peak hp about 3500rpm. not calling you a liar but I would have to see it to believe it. stock they are 325@3300 & 570@2,000 that's a far cry from 5252 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SpaceGhost Posted November 28, 2004 Report Share Posted November 28, 2004 On a dyno my car makes more Tq than hp. Actually my car really is an import, assembled and made in Japan fresh off the boat....I'm as JDM as they come. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SilverEvo8owner Posted November 28, 2004 Report Share Posted November 28, 2004 There's an STi coming from Quantum with more tq than whp, both figures in the 400s. I'll see if I can find the dyno thread. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SilverEvo8owner Posted November 28, 2004 Report Share Posted November 28, 2004 I take that back. 440 lb.ft, 447 WHP. tongue.gif Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest stvbreal Posted November 28, 2004 Report Share Posted November 28, 2004 I had to replace the test pipe with a highflow cat and detune to pass emissions here. Currently 351 torque. Slightly higher than the HP. You can add another 100 to it by summertime. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doug1647545489 Posted November 28, 2004 Report Share Posted November 28, 2004 my motor makes way more torque then hp. A long ass stroke will do that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
copperhead Posted November 28, 2004 Report Share Posted November 28, 2004 Originally posted by Perfect Enemy: You are the only one that has had a problem so far, so shut the fuck up before I do it for you. My intentions for this thread is that I see lots of dyno threads from hopped up imports. Most of them have much more horsepower than torque, which I understand why it is so. However, I wanted to know if any of you produced more torque than horsepower. It just didn't seem like the trend.If you are talking about small displacement motors, like a honda 1.8L or something, in order to get that horsepower they have to rev much higher. The higher the rev, the larger the difference between the horsepower and torque numbers. When you are talking about a larger displacement motor with the same number of pistons, such as my 2.4, the longer stroke prevents it from revving as high as the 1.8 honda, therefore keeping the horsepower lower than the torque number. It's all about the equation to measure horsepower, like Joel was talking about. My redline is 5600 RPM, obviously it stops making power well before that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
excell Posted November 28, 2004 Author Report Share Posted November 28, 2004 Originally posted by copperhead: If you are talking about small displacement motors, like a honda 1.8L or something, in order to get that horsepower they have to rev much higher. The higher the rev, the larger the difference between the horsepower and torque numbers. When you are talking about a larger displacement motor with the same number of pistons, such as my 2.4, the longer stroke prevents it from revving as high as the 1.8 honda, therefore keeping the horsepower lower than the torque number. It's all about the equation to measure horsepower, like Joel was talking about. My redline is 5600 RPM, obviously it stops making power well before that. I know why it makes less torque, but I wanted to know who is defying the laws of JDMYO on CR. tongue.gif Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OGRE Posted November 28, 2004 Report Share Posted November 28, 2004 Originally posted by copperhead: Originally posted by Perfect Enemy: [qb]... like Joel was talking about. I was talking about diesels in particular (which do have long strokes, but more in reference to why they don't rev to 5000 RPM is that the burn rate of diesel fuel is significantly slower than gasoline . http://www.popularmechanics.com/automotive/motor_sports/2002/11/worlds_fastest_pickup/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mowgli1647545497 Posted November 28, 2004 Report Share Posted November 28, 2004 Originally posted by Regenmeister: and dont forget this, more torque then horsepower, AND more of both then any other engine ever concieved. Wrong. The Saturn V stage one equaled 160,000,000 horsepower. Thats about double the amount of potential hydroelectric power that would be available at any given moment if all the moving waters of North America were channeled through turbines. Mmmm. The Saturn V. That one is more of both of them than any other engine ever. Made in the USA. (Ok I'm contributing nothing to this flame thread so I'll go now.) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
excell Posted November 28, 2004 Author Report Share Posted November 28, 2004 It's not a flame thread. tongue.gif Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
copperhead Posted November 29, 2004 Report Share Posted November 29, 2004 Originally posted by Perfect Enemy: I know why it makes less torque, but I wanted to know who is defying the laws of JDMYO on CR. tongue.gif I'll bet the Mercury Mystique I've got for sale makes more horsepower than torque. 2.5L V6, it spins to, I believe, 7k RPM. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rl Posted November 29, 2004 Report Share Posted November 29, 2004 Originally posted by mesteno: seen a couple dyno graphs of 6.0l around 400rwhp making peak hp about 3500rpm. not calling you a liar but I would have to see it to believe it. stock they are 325@3300 & 570@2,000 that's a far cry from 5252 I wouldnt say it if I hadnt seen it. I've seen them rev 5,000+ on a dyno doing some prototype tuning, not the internet. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest doggunracing Posted November 29, 2004 Report Share Posted November 29, 2004 T25 powered KA24DE in a 240sx (not mine, I have a T3/T04E) http://www.engr.uconn.edu/~corrales/carsIM/maxpower_panda.JPG [ 01. December 2004, 12:15 PM: Message edited by: doggunracing ] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BiG BeN Posted November 29, 2004 Report Share Posted November 29, 2004 is that yours keith? thought you had a t3/t4 or somethin'? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mallard Posted December 1, 2004 Report Share Posted December 1, 2004 here's my friends 91 Talon. I'd post my dyno graph but 157hp and 175ft-lbs is far less impressive. Just so you know, he has a dual runner intake manifold so one run was with short runners and the other was long. Once he figures out how to control it it will switch at 4500 rpm, giving him the 370ft-lbs and 322 hp. http://www.msprotege.com/members/Mallard/Pics/Dyno_Chart1.jpg Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest ForcedVR6 Posted December 1, 2004 Report Share Posted December 1, 2004 Yep. 279 WHP and 290 WTRQ @ 8PSI Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trouble Maker Posted December 1, 2004 Report Share Posted December 1, 2004 Originally posted by Mallard: Once he figures out how to control it it will switch at 4500 rpm, giving him the 370ft-lbs and 322 hp.SAFC with the vtec controller. Or just get some 'vtec yo' controller. Or I can make something for you. Umm, damn. Just realized you said Talon, everyone always bashes the JDM yo intake saying it gives no gains. I'm assuming that's what this is? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.