Sturg1647545502 Posted May 22, 2006 Report Share Posted May 22, 2006 http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5137581991288263801 makes you think. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
evan9381 Posted May 23, 2006 Report Share Posted May 23, 2006 i figured this is what it is...i like the 1st edition better Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sturg1647545502 Posted May 23, 2006 Author Report Share Posted May 23, 2006 havent seen it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HotCarl Posted May 23, 2006 Report Share Posted May 23, 2006 there's a first edition? yeah that was crazy. the whole way through i remained skepticle (sp) but he does bring up some very valid points. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
evan9381 Posted May 23, 2006 Report Share Posted May 23, 2006 yeah...theres a version before that. IMO its a bit better. just search for loose change episode 1 or something Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
morabu Posted May 23, 2006 Report Share Posted May 23, 2006 this is long as hell....but it kept me interested all the way through Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OneRunnin72SST Posted May 24, 2006 Report Share Posted May 24, 2006 Interesting and I generally hate that kind of stuff... ~Erik Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zeitgeist57 Posted May 24, 2006 Report Share Posted May 24, 2006 I gotta tell you...I'm still watching this and I'm finding a lot of irrefutable evidence... Really well done. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LJ Posted May 24, 2006 Report Share Posted May 24, 2006 I gotta tell you...I'm still watching this and I'm finding a lot of irrefutable evidence... Really well done. not really, most of it is skewed and taken out of context. I don't have all the stuff anymore, but in one of my classes we were able to prove something like 90% of their proof to be false Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sturg1647545502 Posted May 24, 2006 Author Report Share Posted May 24, 2006 i would like to see some one from the cia, fbi,atf, whoever, sit down and with proof and knock these ideas down. of course that will NEVER happen. Just like anything in the media, i dont put full trust into what is being presented to me( i am a very cynical and skeptial person by nature...most into political sciecne and international studies have to be). this being said, i would like to see this information either backed up or knocked down. they are highlighting some very serious statements in this video. LJ: what was the class you took? i love practical applications like that. have any of the articles left over? id really like to get my hands of them! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
supldys Posted May 25, 2006 Report Share Posted May 25, 2006 wow, the empire state building...theres a difference between a b-52 and a b-25 that really hit it. two prop engines in 1945 are a whole lot different than 8 jet engines. we're talking fuel differences, size differences, and the fact that the b-25 tried to bank away from the empire state building whereas the world trade center was deliberately hit head on. I could go on for hoursa about the rest of this crap, but Im going to bed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thorne Posted May 25, 2006 Report Share Posted May 25, 2006 Ummm ok well. There are pictures of Airliner wreckage from the pentagon... I 've got a scene by scene debunker its like michael moore all over again. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thorne Posted May 25, 2006 Report Share Posted May 25, 2006 http://screwloosechange.blogspot.com/2006/05/terrific-debunking.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
*Hollywood* Posted May 25, 2006 Report Share Posted May 25, 2006 He had better watch what he is saying ,Or he might just get a visit from some men in suits. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kevin R. Posted May 25, 2006 Report Share Posted May 25, 2006 One point I always found valid was how the building would fall comepletely straight down when only the top was damaged... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.