Jump to content

Considering retiring


Tpoppa

Recommended Posts

You're a casino guy, right?  Or is it your wife who always wants to stay at a casino on your epic trips?

Anyway, think of it as a bet.  But you're betting on how long you expect to live - and draw your SS benefit.

If you run the benefit you get at different ages, you'll find that the total amount will be the same at your SS actuarial age.  Based on your numbers, that's at about 77.33 years old in Aug 2036.  ~$415,000.

If you plan to die before then, you should take it ASAP.  If you plan to die at around 77, then it doesn't matter.  If you plan to live to 90, you should wait - $876,000 vs $928,000.

And you should look up the benefit amount if you wait until 70 to receive benefits.  It will still be about the same when you're 77, but a huge amount higher at 90.

Obviously, you have to draw down your savings for your living expenses, but there are a few advantages to that.

    If you're not drawing, you can't be taxed on SS if a dream job drops in your lap and you continue to work.

    Drawing down an IRA or 401(k) will reduce the amount of RMD (Required Minimum Distribution) you'll have to take out at 73 yo.

    If your die and your wife gets your survivor benefit, she'll get the higher amount.

 

Personally, I'm waiting until 70 to start receiving SS.  I'm working part time, when I want to, and supplementing the income with IRA distributions.  I plan to still be riding when I'm 90!

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Tpoppa said:

Yes.  And if you didn't spend that 45k and instead put it into an index fund for 11 years it would likely grow around 250%.   Which extends the break even point even further.

My advice is take it right away.  My Fidelity guy agrees.

 

Or if I draw down current investments while I wait to get SS I lose the income that money would get me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Tpoppa said:

Yes.  And if you didn't spend that 45k and instead put it into an index fund for 11 years it would likely grow around 250%.   Which extends the break even point even further.

My advice is take it right away.  My Fidelity guy agrees.

 

Or if I draw down current investments while I wait to get SS I lose the income that money would get me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I say take it as soon as possible, adjusting for tax brackets the first year, assuming you retire after age 62.

Copied/pasted...

Social Security only counts earned income, such as wages or net business income, when calculating benefits. 
Investment income, such as dividends, interest, and capital gains, is not considered earned income for Social Security purposes. 
However, you may need to pay income taxes on your investment income. 
If your total income, including your investment income, is above certain thresholds, you may owe taxes on some of your Social Security benefits. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Tpoppa said:

If your total income, including your investment income, is above certain thresholds, you may owe taxes on some of your Social Security benefits. 

Damn it. We will certainly be above the 44k limit I just found with Google. Time for more math.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When I retired a little over 5 years ago at age 62 and 2 months, I ran the numbers on taking SS then or waiting until I was 66 and 6 months (my full retirement age).  My so-called “break even point” was age 79.   
 

Figuring I may not live that long,  I started collecting SS immediately and left my very healthy tsp account alone (that’s the federal government version of a 401k) 

I collect a substantial federal pension and my wife gets a smaller pension from the school (same one as Tonik) 

five years later, I still haven’t touched a dime in the tsp which continues to increase every month 👍

Edited by Wahoo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

When I retired last summer, one of the things that I took into serious consideration is that insolvency of Social Security may cause benefits to be reduced in the not too distant future. In the past, I was one of the I'll wait until 70 to collect guys, but a 20% reduction in benefits in say 2033 would extend the "break even" point out to absurdity.  I'm definitely in agreement with Tony & his Fidelity guy. Get it while you can.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...