Uncle Punk

No, the right amount of pressure along with some spit relives the burning sensation.

Eating something the size of his head with hot sauce.

You guys should be nicer to the new guy. I wish he would have decided to stick around, it sounds like he could teach us all a thing or two. I bet he has owned more bikes that most of us. Plus he knows what every knowledgeable motorcyclist knows and that is a Goldwing is faster than any sport bike. Just because he is new doesn't mean you guys should gang up on him even if you are threatened by his knowledge and superior experience. I would bet that right behind that superfast Goldwing his 929 would dust all of you keyboard racers. I will laugh when he comes back in here posting about the kill he made with his tour glide after passing one of you tough guys on them crotch rockets with your fancy Ohio-Riders stickers.

I have asked the mods to do something about this gay sex harassment but am getting no traction. I am however getting additional PMs from guys stating their disappointment in not being included in the gang bang you are planning.

Four of us made it through Friday and it was scheduled to reopen July 8th.

You guys be careful about taking this off topic. Angry Ben will change your avatars; he doesn't like his threads to be jacked. I would suggest you take this conversation to PMs. Speaking of PMs, where do I complain about receiving PMs soliciting me for gay sex?

Now this is how to jack a ride thread. That BMW is serious business.

You should pay attention to this forum we have a lot of useful information and some fun. Stick around a little more and you would know that.

If you want to see a beautiful bike that BMW is it, I love that polished swingarm. I doubt any street Honda ever made has what it takes against that BMW beast.

You people stay off of my favorite road!

repost http://www.ohio-riders.com/showpost.php?p=524374&postcount=1

He doesn't want your stupid Honda slowing him down.

I know 1000rrrider and Jbot know this road so this is for the rest of them to think about. I'm sure Todd would warn you guys before you went on it but I have warned people and this turn still surprises them. http://www.ohio-riders.com/showthread.php?t=29234 Have fun guys and be safe, wish I could make it.

How's he going to get you off of it?

I was certain he would be staying until today. He has hired extra security for his home and the police department has ramped up their manpower. I don't know if that means anything or not.

Give me access to it and I can take care of that for you Friday.

I win, I think Steve has surrendered or butt hurt.

A properly laid pipe will net you the results you are looking for.

"You people" make me mad!

You don't have the time because the idiots posting can't keep from writing 10,000 word essays. Doesn't anyone work?

You are correct about your views smelling of an elitist superiority. You have had training with using firearms and somehow feel everyone else should have training even though you say you don’t expect folks to need boot camp training. The thought police don’t regulate the citizens of Alaska or Vermont, they have no mandatory training other than needing to meet the federal guidelines for dispositions and anyone can carry a firearm. Arizona has passed such a law and other states have them in committees. You shudder to think of such an after the fact system so how can you justify your viewpoint when these states have little problems with these lacks of laws that aren’t ambiguous? I find that the areas with the most regulations to be where the citizens are most at risk. Do you think the people in those areas are defective or do you think the regulations have had unintended consequences? If you can show me an instance where your thought police system works you might have an argument but at this point it’s just your feelings on the subject and laws shouldn’t be implemented for feeling unless they suffer from unintended consequences. If you can find a place where your idea works you will need to make a case for why Alaska and Vermont’s don’t. One’s actions make one more like the criminals not the possession of a tool. I carried plenty of times without a license so I am a criminal? I harmed no one; no one was at risk unless they were a criminal trying to harm me. How can you possibly call me more like a criminal simply because I chose to carry protection? Criminals have made a willful conscious decision to cause harm; I have done no such thing and resent the implication of being similar to them. If you want to call me an elitist because I value and am responsible for my personal protection then I am guilty as charged. I would think that anyone alive should be considered and elitist by that measure. The act of protecting oneself is not disrespecting others and I fail to see how you can come to such a conclusion. Millions of people have a means to protect themselves and yet it doesn’t affect anyone else’s rights. The thought of possessing a firearm is comforting to people weather they are capable of using it or not, why take that away from them? Most of us have the physical tools to defend ourselves from an unarmed attacker but don’t take the time or opportunity to learn how to do it. A woman has the ability to bite off body parts and gouge out an eye if they are being raped but can’t bring themselves to such barbaric acts. Those people aren’t the ones who will be wielding a firearm around either. I think you don’t have enough faith in others ability to recognize their limitations. I absolutely don’t want mandatory safety training; the physical handling of a firearm is simple, in fact less complicated than some power tools. We don’t have mandatory training for every tool simple because of its ability to cause harm. Intent is what you want to regulate and we can’t regulate thoughts. I know the true meaning of muzzle velocity, sustained cyclic rate of fire, maximum effective range, all the carrying conditions and most of the common calibers and find very little value to that information when I simply want to be able to protect myself. That knowledge is not needed when you are being attacked and you want to protect yourself. I find it to be elitist to think everyone else needs to have all that information simply for self defense. I never took any MSF course to ride a motorcycle and I think I rode just fine, the physical operation of a motorcycle is more complicated that a firearm. I guess I have much more faith in my fellow human’s ability to understand how to be responsible without needing a nanny state to guide them in any decision they make. I do acknowledge we have people who know how to take advantage of others and they are the reason for law enforcement. Help is not always available so I take my protection as a task I am responsible for as I think everyone else should. I have continued my education with firearms and motorcycles beyond what I could have taught myself but I don’t think everyone needs to spend their energies to have the same knowledge I have to be able to defend themselves or enjoy riding, that would be elitist.

I really don't like the federal guidelines at all especially the any felonies or some misdemeanors. A non violent felony without the use of a gun shouldn't deem you unworthy of self defense. I would even allow convicted violent felons who used a gun posses a firearm after a certain time frame of punishment, if they have done their time and paid their debt why keep punishing them. A mistake made at 20 is not the same mistake someone with a family will make at 40, why punish a family by not allowing firearms in the residence? Not all mental illnesses are created equal and shouldn't be judged as so, if you have a grasp of reality and just happen to have some depression how are you a threat to others? I don't have an issue with people who have a mental defect and don't have a grasp of reality being regulated but it should be a very hard state to prove. There are people who don't grasp others views and want to live in a world that they see or people who cling to unrealistic conspiracy theories are they mentally defective? I hate the fact we have allowed the mass of illegal aliens here but I don't find any human should be denied self defense, it's not a government given right to just U.S. citizens it's a God given birth right. I would like to see the illegal’s punished but their crime doesn't warrant death by stripping their ability to protect themselves. The dishonorably discharged should meet a predetermined punishment phase and then be allowed to defend him and his family, see felon comments above. Does anyone believe that the Vermont sixteen year olds are better qualified than the rest of the sixteen year olds? This sounds like a stupid political move to get favoritism or make a bill pass. The restraining order rule is complete bullshit because these restraining orders can be filed by complete idiots as a means to punish someone who isn't a threat. If you want to make it a 2,000 foot rule fine but not the next county over. I also think the domestic violence rule is complete bullshit, if I get into a fight with my brother at 20 should that really mean I lose the right to protect my family at 40? If I had to defend myself from a drunken spouse and got the better of them because they were drunk should I be punished forever once I have left that situation or have started another family? Set a timeframe for punishment; once that debt has been paid remove the restrictions. No crime should have a permanent sentence if you are eligible to get out of jail, especially one that involves yourself preservation. We can debate what crimes should keep you in jail permanently but that’s not the point I’m trying to make.

I hate jack booted thug moderators.

Some of this has to do with the participants and some of it has to do with me thinking RVTPilot's thinking could be changed. We didn't have to ignore someone spewing shit to make our points. I have done that in the past but only when the arguments were ridiculous and no one was going to change their mind. I would bet a year after RVTPilot has his license his views will be different than they are today.