Lustalbert Posted September 14, 2006 Report Share Posted September 14, 2006 1980 Chevrolet Caprice Classic 18.5 21.4 Closest thing to my Buick (same body, smoger 350 instead of the smoger 307 I used to have.) New numbers on the 29th hopefully..... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Miller Posted September 14, 2006 Report Share Posted September 14, 2006 I will take yooooooou down Andrew :thumpdown: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lustalbert Posted September 14, 2006 Report Share Posted September 14, 2006 I should hope so. My frame rails have more steel than your entire car. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TTQ B4U Posted October 14, 2006 Report Share Posted October 14, 2006 agree....my 99 GTP ran 14.6's all day bone stock once I learned to hook up and hold 2nd. My GXP will do 13.8's with nothing but it's FWI vs 14.3's the mags seems to get out of it. Those are crappy stock times, as mentioned above. Those magazine editors must need lessons in launching. Their GTP times are way off (Mine ran 14.65 in street trim, with my rookie ass at the wheel), and their stating the '92 Tempo GLS as a mid 17-sec car is wrong. Those cars could run in the low 16's (V6 5-speed) all day long. They were referred to as the 'poor man's SHO'. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest 2akro Posted May 14, 2007 Report Share Posted May 14, 2007 I went to Norwalk last friday and ran my stock 2006 Suzuki Hayabusa and i run the 1/4 in 10.199 at 140 mph! Stock Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DaddyBuiltRacing Posted August 30, 2007 Report Share Posted August 30, 2007 1991 Honda CRX Si 8.7 16.5 (I went 16.3) 1991 Ford Mustang GT 7.3 15.6 (Im one hell of a driver cause I went 14.7) Wish they had one for swapped hondas what they should run, would like to see what a bone stock LS in a crx is supposed to do Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SPLN SUX Posted August 30, 2007 Report Share Posted August 30, 2007 1996-2002 Viper Hennessey Venom 1000TT 2.3 9.52.... Weaksauce 2002 Chevrolet Corvette (Lingenfelter 427 twin turbo) 1.97 9.24 Thats just scary. Id pay to ride for one pass in that car. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ProwlerZ Posted September 28, 2007 Report Share Posted September 28, 2007 I'm thinking there's something else going on with the T/A and the Z/SS... .2 is too much for drag, Camaros aren't big squares ya know? guess I gotta go look up some other sources... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hpfiend Posted October 2, 2007 Report Share Posted October 2, 2007 2007 Shelby GT500 can only do 5.0 13.6. That's sad. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tripleskate Posted June 20, 2008 Report Share Posted June 20, 2008 8 seconds to 60 and ~16 seconds on the quarter. Now once I get a couple bolt ons.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qwkgto Posted August 14, 2008 Report Share Posted August 14, 2008 the gto is .. 2005 Pontiac GTO LS2 4.6 13.0 w/AT (GM Sales Literature) 2005 Pontiac GTO LS2 4.7 13.1 w/MT (GM Sales Literature) WTF is 4.6 and 4.7? its a 6.0 on both the 05-06 gto. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wonderboy Posted August 25, 2008 Report Share Posted August 25, 2008 15.6 stock? With intake and exhaust = 14.8. Still slow but a hell of an improvement and if I could get it off the line a little better I could prolly do 14.6. Thats like a whole second faster than stock. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Farkas Posted August 25, 2008 Report Share Posted August 25, 2008 I find most times to be inaccurate.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Farkas Posted August 25, 2008 Report Share Posted August 25, 2008 Says my old Corolla GT-S was supposed to run an 18.6x and I ran a fucking 16.8 in that shit.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lawnman Posted September 13, 2008 Report Share Posted September 13, 2008 the gto is .. 2005 Pontiac GTO LS2 4.6 13.0 w/AT (GM Sales Literature) 2005 Pontiac GTO LS2 4.7 13.1 w/MT (GM Sales Literature) WTF is 4.6 and 4.7? its a 6.0 on both the 05-06 gto. 4.6 and 4.7 are 0 - 60 times. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TN94Z28 Posted November 12, 2009 Report Share Posted November 12, 2009 According to this link my CAI increased my 1/4 mi. by 0.3 even with my sucky reaction time? lol i dont think thats right Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Removed Posted November 12, 2009 Report Share Posted November 12, 2009 According to this link my CAI increased my 1/4 mi. by 0.3 even with my sucky reaction time? lol i dont think thats right look at the date on the post before yours.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thorne Posted November 12, 2009 Report Share Posted November 12, 2009 According to this link my CAI increased my 1/4 mi. by 0.3 even with my sucky reaction time? lol i dont think thats right reaction does not affect your 1/4 mile time Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pontiacfreak142 Posted November 12, 2009 Report Share Posted November 12, 2009 well damn, my car must suck according to those times. It say the 97 3.8 firbird should run 15.5 but my car car did a best of 15.9 with a k&n cone filter and cat back, along with being a no optioned stripper model. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tripleskate Posted November 12, 2009 Report Share Posted November 12, 2009 well damn, my car must suck according to those times. It say the 97 3.8 firbird should run 15.5 but my car car did a best of 15.9 with a k&n cone filter and cat back, along with being a no optioned stripper model. N/A car + elevation + shitty track? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TN94Z28 Posted March 30, 2010 Report Share Posted March 30, 2010 If this site s true wich it prolly isnt, I knocked a .4 off my Quarter time with just a CAI and a wax. Ha ha . Stock exact same difference on mine with only a CAI. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TN94Z28 Posted March 30, 2010 Report Share Posted March 30, 2010 look at the date on the post before yours.... yeah ive never paid attention to details Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
turboion Posted September 27, 2010 Report Share Posted September 27, 2010 2006 Saturn ion 2.4 LE5 stuck 16.3 exhaust spark plugs and air intake 15.1 then a turbo charged with 11 psi 12.64@108 http://www.facebook.com/#%21/photo.php?pid=30998067&fbid=1415162061828&id=1315871358 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nurkvinny Posted October 3, 2010 Author Report Share Posted October 3, 2010 2006 Saturn ion 2.4 LE5 stuck 16.3 exhaust spark plugs and air intake 15.1 then a turbo charged with 11 psi 12.64@108 http://www.facebook.com/#%21/photo.php?pid=30998067&fbid=1415162061828&id=1315871358 This thread was for 100% stock 1/4 mile times. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest 72olds442 Posted February 23, 2012 Report Share Posted February 23, 2012 my cars not on here =( Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.