DKilbourne Posted May 15, 2009 Report Share Posted May 15, 2009 All that shit done to your car and you're running stock ls1 times? That really isn't that much done to it and how many of the stock LS1's actually ran low 13's. I know of a few that ran low 13's way back, but they had lid and catback. I know those cars are capable, but most of the drivers aren't. What does your stock LS1 run by the way? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TurboRust Posted May 15, 2009 Report Share Posted May 15, 2009 jeffro was that with you or magic dyno brian running the car? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cordell Posted May 15, 2009 Report Share Posted May 15, 2009 Congrats on the time. You really blew right past the 13 sec mark with a low 13 sec pass. I'm really amazed that the tune in the car was that bad a few weeks ago, the results speak highly of Dyno Brian and why cars need tuned after mods. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Archie Posted May 15, 2009 Report Share Posted May 15, 2009 Sounds like you need a "Chad's turbo kit"... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alex L. Posted May 15, 2009 Report Share Posted May 15, 2009 Hmm.....I think that I need more boost. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DKilbourne Posted May 15, 2009 Report Share Posted May 15, 2009 jeffro was that with you or magic dyno brian running the car? 1.88 on radials, who do you think it was Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snowflake Posted May 15, 2009 Report Share Posted May 15, 2009 1.88 was best 60 ft That was the best 60' when you ran the 14.2 or the low 13? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alex L. Posted May 15, 2009 Report Share Posted May 15, 2009 hate hate hate hate hate hate hate hate Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jeffro Posted May 15, 2009 Author Report Share Posted May 15, 2009 best 60ft with 14.2 was 2.0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snowflake Posted May 15, 2009 Report Share Posted May 15, 2009 very nice job then. that tune helped out a whole lot... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Hal Posted May 15, 2009 Report Share Posted May 15, 2009 Awesome Jeff, great job. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jeffro Posted May 15, 2009 Author Report Share Posted May 15, 2009 thanks everybody. once the DRs go on we'll see if ive got a 12 sex gt Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alex L. Posted May 15, 2009 Report Share Posted May 15, 2009 So when's the turbo going on? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nitrousbird Posted May 15, 2009 Report Share Posted May 15, 2009 So basically what you have shown is it took the Mustang until 99 to run on par with the LT1 F-body cars, mod for mod. Decent 60' on street tires though..... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DTM Brian Posted May 16, 2009 Report Share Posted May 16, 2009 What was both the advertised ET's out of the magazines and real world results in terms of 1/4 mile performance for the LT1 cars in 100% stock form? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stimmel1647545512 Posted May 16, 2009 Report Share Posted May 16, 2009 1996 Chevrolet Camaro Z28 5.7 14.1 1999 Ford Mustang GT 5.5 14.1 That is straight from a legit sight... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DTM Brian Posted May 16, 2009 Report Share Posted May 16, 2009 1996 Chevrolet Camaro Z28 5.7 14.1 1999 Ford Mustang GT 5.5 14.1 That is straight from a legit sight... Thank you sir for the information Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stimmel1647545512 Posted May 16, 2009 Report Share Posted May 16, 2009 your welcome and sorry for being a retard and spelling it sight instead of site my bad ive been working on cars outside all day im tired. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Squale iii Posted May 16, 2009 Report Share Posted May 16, 2009 Had the GT down at kilkare this evening. reaction: .7220 60 Ft: 1.8810 330 ft: 5.5170 1/8 ET: 8.4851 1/4 ET: 13.1909 1/4 MPH: 105.61 mods: Chip and Tune(tuned by dyno Brian :nod:) BBk Cold Air Intake 70MM throttle body 75MM Accufab Plenum BBK O/R X-Pipe Flowmaster Catback Pro 5.0 short throw shifter 4.10 gears Z rated Street Radials. Here is a pic of tires in which got a 1.88 short time 12's are right around the corner with a set of drag radials. Should of seen the look on the guys face who ran a 13.33 in his LS2 6.0 GTO :bangbang: http://titanserver.servepics.com/Titan%20Server/Pictures/Misc/SDC10415.JPG Are you really bragging about a 13.1 @ 105 with all those mods? Way to trap 4mph less than a stock LS1 Fbody... :/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stimmel1647545512 Posted May 16, 2009 Report Share Posted May 16, 2009 That really inst "a lot" of mods just basic cheap shit the motor has never been cracked open, leave the damn kid alone who cares what stock fbody runs. Not everyone wants some shitty z28 that sounds like dick with any aftermarket exhaust. The kid is 18 and has a lot nicer car than most people had at 18 Im sure. He has a clean car that runs a decent time that he is proud of. IMO comments like "dude thats twice the time jamies supra runs in the 1/4 get a real car" are just about as cool as shitting up a for sale add. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DTM Brian Posted May 16, 2009 Report Share Posted May 16, 2009 The mph for this car should put it in the 12's with ease with a little better 60 foot and less wheel spin on the 1-2 powershift. A set of drag radials should do the trick. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bam Posted May 16, 2009 Report Share Posted May 16, 2009 The mph/times are good for the car/mods, it puts down less whp than a stock ls1 so it shouldn't be faster per say... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DTM Brian Posted May 16, 2009 Report Share Posted May 16, 2009 Stimmel, What is the website that you got your times from for the LT1 and 2V car? I am curious what the advertised et is for a stock 02 ZO6. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stimmel1647545512 Posted May 16, 2009 Report Share Posted May 16, 2009 Four years later they got frustrated and supercharged them Then GM knew that had nothing so they straight up didnt come out with a car in 2003 that was competition haha. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stimmel1647545512 Posted May 16, 2009 Report Share Posted May 16, 2009 There was no 2003 Corvette opps you got me lol...I met to say in the same class mustangs and corvettes are not in the same class the corvette would of been competing with the ford GT Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.