Uncle Punk

I can't imagine who would want to block me, I'm full of niceness

Mine very rarely if ever makes it off of the 70s channel.

Since being ratified the first ten amendments commonly known as the bill of rights have remained intact but there is no mechanism in place that I am aware of that protects them from being repealed. Amendments have been ratified and repealed in our history so don't rely on an amendment to be there to serve you if you don't protect it. The people we elect to office in any capacity have meaning; the right to vote for representatives that will serve to protect our established bill of rights should be our vigilance. Amendments are not natural or inalienable rights they are laws of the land and subject to review. I could foresee a time when given the right set of circumstances that several amendments could fall under review. I highly doubt that this will occur in my lifetime but I have lived through enough change that I don’t understand or never could have predicted that all bets are off.

Stop by the Kawasaki booth and say Hi, I will be there Saturday from 11:00 to closing.

We are drowning in taxation yet it still isn't enough to quench the thirst of government. This country had a revolution because we were over taxed by a government and they weren't going into debt ruling us. Imagine if we were taxed at a rate to balance current spending, talk about a tipping point.

That is a good price with the included barrel, I wouldn't apologize for that. New Gen4 going rate around here is around $580 without the extra barrel.

Gouger. Selling the pistol A la carte without any magazines?

If you don't respond to the situation above you will lose in court with or without an LLC that’s why I said you need to respond and document the resolutions. Personal negligent injury will allow the value of the property to be attacked whether the principals of the LLC are shielded from liable or not. The vast majority of tenant/landlord disputes end up in small claims court where you have to be able to defend yourself with or without a lawyer, in my area an LLC can’t defend or go after litigation in small claims court which adds unnecessary expense to hire a lawyer for the higher court. LLCs do have value and in this case I think he should have one. Try to originate a mortgage on a single family dwelling with an LLC and you will eat up any gain by the added rate. Banks don't like to loan to an entity that is shielded from established recourse. Multi-family dwellings and partnerships practically require an LLC but this isn't the case here and if he didn't have mitigating circumstances an LLC wouldn't apply with the exception of an unmortgaged property.

WTF Mr. Overmoderator, with the exception of the first post that was corrected by the second post there has been nothing incorrect here that is stirring the pot. In fact we were discussing how ineffective an assault weapons ban is because you can use a simple rifle to kill people as well. Did you jump to a conclusion without reading the thread like Swingset did? The exchange between us should have been a minor distraction and I hold no ill will toward anyone. Well maybe I do toward the overmoderator for moving this to R&R for no reason. We were having a real discussion with actual factual information. There was no pot stirring going on. If you take exception to the exchange between Swingset and I move that out to a thread that will certainly die because it was meaningless and my involvement with him was simply to keep the thread on track in the informed direction it was going.

Fairly certain we just killed the thread.

The OP corrected himself before anyone else had a chance to respond. I posted a link to the actual state report that has been public for a few days now. We were having an adult conversation about the factual information when you decided to tell us how we weren't doing it right. We had already taken care of the wrong information on the first page by the second post and for sure by the third post. You show up on the third page like some half cocked noob addressing a matter already taken care of. You usually contribute good content so I know you are capable of following along, it didn’t make sense to me that you needed to rehash the first post especially since it had already been taken care of, kind of like you hadn’t read the whole thread. If you have a problem with the link I provided not having anything to do with the OP we can address that but I need you to explain how you come to that conclusion.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bonus_Army

Problem with absorbing information? There is no info wars bullshit going on here. Go back and actually read links before you prematurely admonish the informed.

See official report posted earlier in this thread. Shotgun was in the car as clearly seen in video at the time of them clearing the weapon in the trunk.

Really, never mind, do you know now? Not all ARs are assault weapons. Thousands of AR variants were bought and sold under the old ban.

There was no lying going on, an AR was used but it didn't meet the assault weapons ban criteria to be defined as an assault weapon it was a simple AR rifle.

I missed the part where an AR wasn't used. I'm certain one was used but that doesn't mean it was an assault weapon. Assault weapons are banned in that state as per the last national assault weapons ban that the state continued after the national one expired. This crime was committed by a mad man using a rifle. Rifles are used in such a small % of murders that it's not worth making new laws for them.

http://www.ct.gov/despp/cwp/view.asp?Q=517284&A=4226 Assault weapon ban is in effect in that state, the AR was a legally owned rifle that didn't meet the assault rifle description in that state, it was a simple rifle. Why the new assault rifle ban push?

It's a cock, a big black one, want to feel it?

This offends you?

Sell, sell, sell. Every layer of protection you add is additional expense up front or on the back end. I would check with the local small claims court to see if an LLC can defend itself in matters without in needed to be kicked up to a higher court.

You have more issues that need professional help. If the house is already at risk in business failure you can't protect it, if it isn't get working on that LLC or do a creative sell for a loss, then protect the remaining money in several ways easily laid out with a competent financial planner or accountant. Read this again as sell and even more so now that I know you have exposure for other losses with known personal assets. I have found no real formula for success in renting, trust me I do everything I can to limit bad outcomes but still end up in court more than not. I never lose but never collect either, renters usually don’t have assets and most don’t have jobs that they can’t walk away from when garnished. I have had luck with military and can imagine that long time public employees would work out. Forget appointment showings. Set up an open house, leave agreements for prospectives to look at and applications for interested parties. Go over them at your leisure and reshow if needed. Trust me you will save a lot of time doing this.

An LLC in your case is of very little value to single family dwellings for a multitude of reasons. That said you own the property outright so you could shield yourself from some exposure. Don't waste your time in this situation, carry the proper insurance, address tenant concerns and document the course of action, you have lived in the house so you have assumed any risk yourself. The LLC won't shield you from loss and that is your greatest risk exposure. If you are trying to mitigate your loss in a declining market by waiting for prices to come back be careful of increasing your loss by doing this, you have bought in the same market so it’s a wash. You can make money at this but not without causing a time suck at what you could be doing that actually makes money. A single family dwelling isn't worth the distraction. I could write a full page of personal experience on his subject let alone what I have seen others go through. Your case is not one that ends well. This is not to say that people don't make money doing this, I know several. Your situation doesn't end well unless you work the shit out of it. Contracts don't mean shit, I have never lost a dispute but disputes happen in the vast majority of cases. Sell, sell, sell.

Look out the midget says he can get on now.

http://www.ct.gov/despp/cwp/view.asp?Q=517284&A=4226 The AR was a simple rifle as described by the states assault weapons ban.