Geeesammy

It's amazing what you find out on BITOG. I learned that "Synthetic" doesn't mean synthetic in the first 30 seconds lol. Also was amazed some of the "cheap" oil was as good if not better than the "good" oil.

Yeah, $399,000? I guess I don't know enough about boats. I would anticipate one in used condition in good shape to go for $450+ all day.

That isn't as terrible as I expected to be honest.

Go here http://www.bobistheoilguy.com/ and read to your hearts desire. You will know more than you want to and walk away informed....hopefully. And the second part was basically just saying that no matter what the oil is (according to the .gov) "good enough" to be put into your engine. It's like a Food and Drug administration but for oil... Look at the little round emblem on the back of a quart of oil tomorrow at work, you will see it on there. It will have different designations sometimes. But in a nutshell, any oil should work in one of those. If it was a motor constantly seeing 8,000 rpm maybe it would be different, but as far as I know the Maxipad does not have a racekar motor.

I saw the thread title and thought YEW ALREADY KNO IT'S DA BUSTA ON DAT GOOD GOOD Not really, but all oil is of the same "minimum" grade according to government standards. So anything really is going to work. I got a lot of Lucas at crackhead price a few months back, or else I'd be changing the Supra's with the $17.99 deal AZ usually has.

The vehicle was running and warmed up with the transmission in neutral, correct? Sounds like you should get the right amount of fluid in and verify the old fluid isn't burnt or pitch black. I think the trans fluid up until 06 was dexron III/ mercon which is an obivious red.

Check the fluid level? Would have done that before I drove it.

It looks like a base model very early production Z to me. Nothing very fast about those.

Interesting. There is something else that I always see near Polaris that has a "KTHXBAI" plate. I forget what the car is, but I want to say it's a 350z, which really makes me laugh.

After asking him on facebook a few weeks ago, he thought the whole harness was shot, multiple people told him to check both CPS', and a few other things. One of his buddies chimed in to tell me and others we were wrong and the simple shit compared to a harness swap didn't need checked. How do people like this balance a checkbook

A hunnit to run my janky Supra that will never make power in your Accord?

All I got out of this for the few moments I watched is that you are too cheap to bet $20....:gabe:

No doubt that having the plate obscured (if it is) would be illegal. I don't think he is trying to argue that, I think the main question here is the legality of him being issued the ticket and if it could theoretically be issued in the way it was. Unfortunately this is more of an "officers opinion" citation than anything else in my book, meaning one policeman having a bad day can issue it to a semi-questionable plate. But obviously if it was mounted facing downward to the rear tire or something then I would really doubt it would stand a chance, and almost would be deserved no matter the circumstance in that case lol.

http://i.imgur.com/8sXfIbS.jpg

Nice werkings. Can't wait to see the new finished product soon. Keep up the excellent work.

THANKS FOR STEALING MY PICTURE I SPENT 5 MINUTES ON

The way I read and interpreted this was that a "secondary offense" they refer to is one the is listed at the bottom of the page, I didn't read each one individually but to me it sounded like texting while driving, a temporary permit license violation, no seat belt, headlight(s) or taillight(s) out or not working properly, a violation of Probationary license laws, and child restraints. Seeing as how you are on a bike, I don't see how 4 of the 6 apply to you. I'm assuming you had your lights on, as well as your licensing sorted out as well. According to 4511.093, " As used in this section, "secondary traffic offense" means a violation of division......division (A)(3) of section 4513.03...." According to Division (A)(3) of section 4513.03 "At any time when the windshield wipers of the vehicle are in use because of precipitation on the windshield. Every motorized bicycle shall display at such times lighted lights meeting the rules adopted by the director of public safety under section 4511.521 of the Revised Code. No motor vehicle, during such times any time specified in this section, shall be operated upon a street or highway within this state using only parking lights as illumination. Whenever in such sections a requirement is declared as to the distance from which certain lamps and devices shall render objects visible, or within which such lamps or devices shall be visible, such distance shall be measured upon a straight level unlighted highway under normal atmospheric conditions unless a different condition is expressly stated. Whenever in such sections a requirement is declared as to the mounted height of lights or devices, it shall mean from the center of such light or device to the level ground upon which the vehicle stands." Now, according to my interpretation of 4511.521 Operation of motorized bicycles, nothing is mentioned about lighting or placement of a license/identification plate, I didn't read the entire thing, but I searched for a few key phrases and saw nothing. I'd think that this would be a pretty easy win if my reading serves me right, but this isn't a lawyers interpretation or anything, but if you feel as if you can win it, I'd fight it. This to me seems like a bogus ticket, not only for when/where it was issued, but also if the placement of the plate is within the law. Remember, the plate also has to be illuminated at night, so if it wasn't, make sure it is in the pictures.

Inb4 bans. Also lets all go to Florida to riot against these white folk who don't know better. DISCLAIMER: I am white. This Is all sarcastic.

After two weeks...... :gabe:

Congrats! Being an LS junkie myself, I can totally appreciate this. What is even better is it still being on the freaking 10 bolt!!!!

You said so yourself, "Samwise."

Fixed.

Bug's within a tune, or just bugs in general?

Man, I sure luv dem scrippers.

Semi-related.