shittygsxr

I feel your pain nick.

Nice!

That was a crazy twist!!!! "Suck my white dick"????? No way I would have ever guessed he was a white guy!

More plot twists than inception!!

That was like watching the sixth sense.

....

Anyone in the cbus area want to grab a drink tonight? I could really use 1 or 10!

Yes

I am a Chicago native so I am an Italian beef fan. (Not referring to Italian guys wieners)

We have a Chicago style restaurant in Columbus called wholly joes. It has become much more popular lately.

My suggestion find a low rent place, chances are it will take a while to catch on. When it does open another place in a nicer area

If anyone wants it as a straight track bike I am interested in the oem bodywork

Yeah easter sunday is the 31st of march

I don't think I have ever seen a cop operate within the confines of what they are allowed to do

I have already seen that movie

This article is only true if assume blatant incompetence is not a factor.

Wait, what's his going rate for a good BJ? I usually am the giver, but I'd love to be the taker for a few minutes.

I've never had to pay

Well they only weigh 7000 and that would look high class redneck

I really hate my job and need to do some stupid shit before I quit

Let's take a step back and get a few things straight before continuing this discussion:

Kevin Schwantz's personality is completely irrelevant when it comes to the merits of his legal claims. He can be the biggest a-hole in the world, and still be right, and he can be Mother Theresa and not have a leg to stand on. If he's likeable, that just means that the public is more likely to feel sorry for him without knowing all the facts, or irrespective of those facts.

As far as I have read, Schwantz has sued COTA claiming "tortious interference with contract," and "fraud."

As one might guess, in order for there to be interference with a contract, a contract has to exist. I haven't read any hard evidence that says any contract between COTA and Kevin's company ever existed. I've more gotten the impression that they were negotiating and possibly talking about forming a contract.

The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure require that fraud claims must be pleaded with particularity. The idea is, I can't just accuse a party of fraud and leave them guessing as to what I think they did to defraud me. There may or may not be a real claim there. Without more facts, we simply can't say.

But this is how I'd speculate things went down, give or take a few details:

KS wants to bring MotoGP to Texas. Awesome. So he calls up Dorna and says, "hey, if I can work something out with the COTA, would you guys consider a third American GP in 2013?" Dorna says, "we're listening," but commits to nothing.

KS approaches COTA with something like, "hey, you're building a track, and I've got interest from Dorna that MotoGP might come here if you build it right." COTA listens, and builds the track to accommodate bikes, but commits to nothing.

Fast-forward 3 or 4 years, and now it's all real. The track is complete, Dorna would like to schedule a round at COTA, and KS is acting as middle-man to make that happen. He'd like for that to mean he's the promoter.

...But negotiations break down, and KS wants something that either COTA or Dorna isn't willing to give him. They realize, "hey, this Schwantz guy is the one causing conflict here. Let's just do the deal without him, save us both some money, and eliminate the arguing." Deal done.

The question is where/if fraud occurred in that (admittedly completely speculative and very vague) timeline; and if Schwantz ever actually had a contract with COTA or Dorna.

If a contract existed, then Schwantz may have something. If not, I don't see this getting very far in its current form. An agreement to agree is not a contract... A contract requires an offer, acceptance, and a promise in exchange for 'valuable consideration.' That means money must have changed hands, or one party must have given up some legal right (like their ability to negotiate with others, etc.)

Again, as of now, I haven't read anything to indicate that such steps were taken, which makes everything up to that point "mere negotiations." If we're not getting all the facts, there may be a different outcome.

Where I think KS has a lot more traction is in a claim for quasi-contract. There, the court basically creates a contract to prevent unjust enrichment based on the plaintiff's detriment.

KS certainly did a lot of leg-work establishing the relationship between Dorna and COTA, as well as his own expertise in making the track safe. He does deserve compensation for those efforts, even if no contract to promote the race actually existed. But he's not going to stop the race, nor is he going to win the promotional rights...

In summary, COTA doesn't appear to have done anything illegal. Unethical? Possibly. Maybe even probably. But it's a court of law, not a court of fair.

So in your hypothetical, I don't know shit about what happened, scenario Kevin doesn't have a case?

You already work 60 hours a week welding and 10 a week sucking dick. When are you gonna sleep

well they are 36' long with the tounge

Do you think my porsche can tow it? I have a 10,000 lb tow rating

Shitty what is your cayenne like?

I love it so far. Twin turbo awd launches are nice.

Not cheap, actually built for more severe weather than standard campers

Yes, but not issue now. It was because they were built and put right into service with no air out time. Normally trailers sit for awhile between purchase and usage due to sitting at dealer lots and such. The FEMA ones were sent straight from the factory to home site. The formaldehyde is in most all building materials, it was normal and not something to do with FEMA trailers specifically

I don't mind if I lose some braincells I just wouldn't want to smell anything. I would love to be an asshole and tow one to work and take a shitload of spaces

Didn't the FEMA trailers have formaldehyde issues?

Why isn't there a sticker/t-shirt/merch representative?

Who the fuck is this guy?

This is how I see it.

Clean Title = Title is not branded for odometer discrepancy, odometer exceeded mechanical limits, lemon buyback, salvage, theft recovery or any other thing that would reduce the value of the vehicle itself.

Clear Title = The title is in the seller's name, has no liens, and does not have to jump through any hoops to assign the title (such as getting an additional owner/divorce judge/bankruptcy judge to sign off on the sale, etc) that would delay or complicate the assignment of the title.

In Hand = The title is in the seller's possession, not being held by the bank or locked away in a safe deposit box at his ex-wife's bank or missing, and is ready to be handed over once notarized.

When I sell a vehicle I have the buyer inspect the title then watch me write their details in the title assignment section, then I keep the title to be notarized next business day before mailing it on. Never had any problem with this approach.

I like this explanation. In hand is definitely different than clear

35i nearly fully loaded...the 50i was just too pricey when you factor in the 13MPG mileage it gets. I did drive one though, the sound of that engine is magical.

the 50i is really nice but the x6M is cool as shit

Very expensive...I have friends with RR's and they regret it. Pick up a nice CPO BMW - maintenance is included. I pick up this guy this evening:

love the X6!!! I tried buying a couple at auction, which model did you get?

Range Rover hse sport

2007 rr sport non supercharged 70,000 ish miles

What kind of maintenance costs will I be looking at as it gets more miles on her? I hear these are very expensive to maintain. Just looking for some insight if anyone has had one.

If you are going to get a pain in the ass vehicle make sure you get the supercharged one so you can at least have fun between service intervals