I don't agree with what they did, but I don't think any of them would have been convicted anyway - not when the judge made a finding that the decision to open fire was reasonable given the information they were told, and that the suspect vehicle was being used as a weapon and ramming into a police car. I agree that they should be disciplined for breaking protocol, if that's actually what happened. If there were no protocols for this situation, or for avoiding this situation, then that is a symptomatic of a larger failure within the leadership. I'm curious as to what would have happened if they had charged Brelo with abuse of a corpse, or criminal damaging of the vehicle. They're misdemeanor offenses, but when all else failed, you can't say "you can't prove they were alive when he shot" and also say "you can't prove they were dead when he shot the bodies." It is beyond a reasonable doubt that they were either alive or dead, and bullets from his firearm struck those people/corpses. One must necessarily be true (or so I would have argued).