SLOWLX Posted February 12, 2011 Report Share Posted February 12, 2011 http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,510707,00.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CRAWDAD Posted February 12, 2011 Report Share Posted February 12, 2011 Yep, Me too. I have to take drug test. If I don't pass I can't donate to their lasy ass. If you can afford drugs, then you don't need public asstance. If you don't do drugs you shouldn't be worried about passing the test to recieve your free shit. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Jones Posted February 12, 2011 Report Share Posted February 12, 2011 This is common sense, they are just afraid of a mass riot from the angry drugged up welfare cheats. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alex L. Posted February 13, 2011 Report Share Posted February 13, 2011 Why you take my free drug money bro? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
99FLHRCI Posted February 13, 2011 Report Share Posted February 13, 2011 It was already passed and then banned as unconstitutional in Michigan. State Supreme Court saw it as violating their rights against illegal search and seizure. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SLOWLX Posted February 13, 2011 Author Report Share Posted February 13, 2011 It was already passed and then banned as unconstitutional in Michigan. State Supreme Court saw it as violating their rights against illegal search and seizure. That's Bullshit Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TTQ B4U Posted February 13, 2011 Report Share Posted February 13, 2011 It was already passed and then banned as unconstitutional in Michigan. State Supreme Court saw it as violating their rights against illegal search and seizure. Then cut the amount of welfare by 90%. Make it an "option" for those wishing to show they live drug free that they get the difference if they take a drug test and pass. If they want to fuck with the test being admissible, then change the program amounts and put an option in there for them. Hell, you'll know the users as they will be the ones not opting to go for it right away. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cordell Posted February 13, 2011 Report Share Posted February 13, 2011 It was already passed and then banned as unconstitutional in Michigan. State Supreme Court saw it as violating their rights against illegal search and seizure. I don't get how that's illegal search and seizure, if they want their public assistance buy it with a CLEAN urine sample. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brandon Posted February 13, 2011 Report Share Posted February 13, 2011 I don't get how that's illegal search and seizure, if they want their public assistance buy it with a CLEAN urine sample. Then there is just that, they will buy one less hit and create a market for clean urine. Drug addicts will always find a fix. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ImUrOBGYN Posted February 13, 2011 Report Share Posted February 13, 2011 I can agree with this, but then they should be able to test for alcohol, too. To me, it's not the kinda drugs you're spending money on; legel/illegal is irrelevant as far as Im concerned. If you wanna drink and/or do drugs, you should be doing it on your own dollar. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CRAWDAD Posted February 13, 2011 Report Share Posted February 13, 2011 Then there is just that, they will buy one less hit and create a market for clean urine. Drug addicts will always find a fix. They already have it. It's a kit. It comes with dehydrorated urine, heater(like a hand warmer) litttle bottle to mix and tape to your leg. stick on thermometer. Bam Bam your done. There would just be more of a market for them. They do work though, I know a couple of people that used them before. $100-$150 price range I think Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
unfunnyryan Posted February 13, 2011 Report Share Posted February 13, 2011 They already have it. It's a kit. It comes with dehydrorated urine, heater(like a hand warmer) litttle bottle to mix and tape to your leg. stick on thermometer. Bam Bam your done. There would just be more of a market for them. They do work though, I know a couple of people that used them before. $100-$150 price range I think I know someone who used to have the whizzinator. Its a fake dick with a bladder pouch, so even if they snuck a peek to make sure you weren't cheating they really couldn't tell. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Exodus Posted February 13, 2011 Report Share Posted February 13, 2011 YES!!! PASS IT. even if it hits other states it will help ours by freeing up money in the government. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Exodus Posted February 13, 2011 Report Share Posted February 13, 2011 The NAACP wouldn't let this pass. they will call it racist. idiots.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
I Eat Rice Posted February 13, 2011 Report Share Posted February 13, 2011 They already have it. It's a kit. It comes with dehydrorated urine, heater(like a hand warmer) litttle bottle to mix and tape to your leg. stick on thermometer. Bam Bam your done. There would just be more of a market for them. They do work though, I know a couple of people that used them before. $100-$150 price range I think It does work or you just do the dilution process and drink alot of water a few days before the test and take a vitamin and some niacin tablets 24hrs before the test to add color back to your pee and bam test passed problem solved. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flyin Miata Posted February 13, 2011 Report Share Posted February 13, 2011 Just don't complain when crime levels go up even further. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BloodRed Posted February 14, 2011 Report Share Posted February 14, 2011 I agree 100% with this law. You want public support, we want to make sure this money isn't being used for illegal purposes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mindset Posted February 14, 2011 Report Share Posted February 14, 2011 This would probably help the National Deficit to a point too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chad is Dead Posted February 14, 2011 Report Share Posted February 14, 2011 I'm for it Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wnaplay1647545503 Posted February 14, 2011 Report Share Posted February 14, 2011 I'm for it also. I can name a few members on my wifes side I would like to turn in for fraud as well. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mjrsplat Posted February 14, 2011 Report Share Posted February 14, 2011 im all for it. plenty of jobs drug test, lazy asses sitting at home living off the government should be drug tested as well. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moostang Posted February 14, 2011 Report Share Posted February 14, 2011 Just don't complain when crime levels go up even further. im for it but against it at the same time. Crime would increase by a lot, so dont be bitching when your car gets stolen Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Exodus Posted February 14, 2011 Report Share Posted February 14, 2011 im for it but against it at the same time. Crime would increase by a lot, so dont be bitching when your car gets stolen maybe they would starve and just die? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sturg1647545502 Posted February 14, 2011 Report Share Posted February 14, 2011 we've had this convo at the firehouse many times...while just about every tax paying citizen is for it, the logistics of doing this once a month is insane. testing kits, lab techs, physical labs, secure couriers and places to do the testing and reading. Plus once a dirty pee is found, the court appeals would be through the roof, all on the "if you cant afford a lawyer, one will be appointed for you". kind of like the death penality. Its more expensive to put someone on death row for 15 20 years and have them and their court appointed lawyer make every appeal made to man than it is to just house them in jail for life...but then you get overcrowding issues. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thorne Posted February 14, 2011 Report Share Posted February 14, 2011 I think it should apply to nicotin to because smokes are expensive. Why should I pay for your smokes. ............ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.