cmh_sprint Posted November 19, 2009 Report Share Posted November 19, 2009 WTFhttp://www2.nbc4i.com/cmh/news/state_regional/article/officers_wont_be_prosecuted_for_fondling_dog/26889/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ponyjr Posted November 19, 2009 Report Share Posted November 19, 2009 Thats fucked up. They can charge someone for shooting their dogs with murder but can't charge a cop fondling their dogs with rape? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Likwid Posted November 19, 2009 Report Share Posted November 19, 2009 how do you know the dog didn't consent?I mean really, the way that dog was dressed ... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jbot Posted November 19, 2009 Report Share Posted November 19, 2009 it sounds like the prude only went to 3rd base. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jhaag Posted November 20, 2009 Report Share Posted November 20, 2009 his punishtment should be his pic on the front page of the paper with the title "The Dog Fondler". i'm sure living that down would be far worse than anything else.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Disclaimer Posted November 20, 2009 Report Share Posted November 20, 2009 I'm disappointed in you jbot... your brizzains must be haxxoredPerfect thread Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jbot Posted November 20, 2009 Report Share Posted November 20, 2009 I'm disappointed in you jbot... your brizzains must be haxxoredPerfect threadbut that would be sensationalist and not factual.the article says he did NOT have sexual relations with that animalblow j's don't count, son! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RSVDon Posted November 20, 2009 Report Share Posted November 20, 2009 I'm disappointed in you jbot... your brizzains must be haxxoredPerfect thread vehry nice jrm Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SWing'R Posted November 20, 2009 Report Share Posted November 20, 2009 ...the article says he did NOT have sexual relations with that animalblow j's don't count, son!"Bestiality in Virginia falls under crimes against nature, which is a felony charge but requires “carnal knowledge” of an animal, implying intercourse."So I guess its a go for dog bj's and hand jobs, woooohooo. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jbot Posted November 20, 2009 Report Share Posted November 20, 2009 red rocket is GO Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.