serpentracer Posted July 29, 2012 Report Share Posted July 29, 2012 just say no. can you believe this crap?http://www.wcpo.com/dpp/news/region_central_cincinnati/downtown/urban-outreach-comes-to-sawyer-point Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Strictly Street Posted July 29, 2012 Report Share Posted July 29, 2012 just say no. can you believe this crap?http://www.wcpo.com/dpp/news/region_central_cincinnati/downtown/urban-outreach-comes-to-sawyer-pointYou sure you got the right link? Socialism? Handing out free school supplies ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jporter12 Posted July 29, 2012 Report Share Posted July 29, 2012 You sure you got the right link? Socialism? Handing out free school supplies ?I was wondering the same... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ReconRat Posted July 29, 2012 Report Share Posted July 29, 2012 Yeah, I don't get it. No different than a food bank. We got 35 of those in Columbus.edit: lol, socialism is where food is cheap but there isn't any... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scottb Posted July 29, 2012 Report Share Posted July 29, 2012 Is this a regional organization? I am from north east Ohio ( south of Cleveland, north of Akron.I suppose if a group wants to pass out school supplies, I am ok with that. I am not familiar with the organization.Is the issue that tax money was used to buy the supplies and then the supplies were given out? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gixxus Christ! Posted July 29, 2012 Report Share Posted July 29, 2012 Article states churches bankroll this....that's not socialism, its charity.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve Butters Posted July 29, 2012 Report Share Posted July 29, 2012 dont feed the troll. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Disclaimer Posted July 29, 2012 Report Share Posted July 29, 2012 Article states churches bankroll this....that's not socialism, its charity....No, its charity once churches start paying taxes. Until then, its socialism. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ReconRat Posted July 29, 2012 Report Share Posted July 29, 2012 No, its charity once churches start paying taxes. Until then, its socialism.Correct, sort of. But it's not actually socialism until the State takes the private acts of charity away from the churches and makes it a function of the State.Oh wait... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Strictly Street Posted July 29, 2012 Report Share Posted July 29, 2012 Clearly the answer is to outlaw either churches or children or both! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drc32-0 Posted July 30, 2012 Report Share Posted July 30, 2012 just say no. can you believe this crap?http://www.wcpo.com/dpp/news/region_central_cincinnati/downtown/urban-outreach-comes-to-sawyer-pointThe only thing I can't believe is how far a conservative will go to call something socialism...it's beginning to look like McCarthyism. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jblosser Posted July 30, 2012 Report Share Posted July 30, 2012 The only thing I can't believe is how far a conservative will go to call something socialism...it's beginning to look like McCarthyism.He's not conservative, more like a Trollderpocratative. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
baptizo Posted July 31, 2012 Report Share Posted July 31, 2012 Article states churches bankroll this....that's not socialism, its charity....This. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Strictly Street Posted July 31, 2012 Report Share Posted July 31, 2012 dont feed the troll.^^ This Summertime and nothing better to do on a motorcycle board than troll.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scruit Posted July 31, 2012 Report Share Posted July 31, 2012 Until the government owns and controls the means of production of goods, it ain't socialism. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gixxus Christ! Posted July 31, 2012 Report Share Posted July 31, 2012 I move we abolish children and churches. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swingset Posted July 31, 2012 Report Share Posted July 31, 2012 Well, this confirms that serpent's performance in the gun threads was no anomaly. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DirtDee675 Posted August 1, 2012 Report Share Posted August 1, 2012 (edited) Well, this confirms that serpent's performance in the gun threads was no anomaly.Haha charitable donations are too socialist for his liking, but he would like to take away your second amendment right. Edited August 1, 2012 by DirtDee675 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve Butters Posted August 1, 2012 Report Share Posted August 1, 2012 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bad324 Posted August 1, 2012 Report Share Posted August 1, 2012 his trolling isn't even that good Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kawi kid Posted August 1, 2012 Report Share Posted August 1, 2012 I hate kids. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YSR_Racer_99 Posted August 1, 2012 Report Share Posted August 1, 2012 The only thing I can't believe is how far a conservative will go to call something socialism...it's beginning to look like McCarthyism.Or how far liberals will go to not see a trend. Not necessarily regarding this thread, but overall. Because of the current administration, conservatives are overly sensitive to a trend that they see/ perceive. Because this administration is agreeable to them, liberals are happy to see it happen. Nothing different than liberals condemning everything (yes. Everything) that Bush did, yet not calling out Obama on any of his policies, even though the current administration can be viewed as more threatening to individual freedoms, i.e. the second amendment (reference Fast 'n Furious). Politics as usual. Broken as usual. Flush Washington. All of it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Disclaimer Posted August 1, 2012 Report Share Posted August 1, 2012 Church related... since this thread is kinda sorta church related.I didn't snopes or verify the first image is legit (via Reddit), but if you assume it is... food for thought. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
magley64 Posted August 1, 2012 Report Share Posted August 1, 2012 First off jeff, Fast n furious is a program that dates back to bush... (although it has changed names) so take that second amendment threat and back it up a little bit.As a person who leans more liberal regarding social and personal freedom issues, I blame Obama more for his in-actions than for his actions.He could've worked to crank back the patriot act, he could've worked to get Gitmo closed and dismantled, but maybe he was busy trying to get the crumbled financial sector back into functioning order...I'm not a fan of his actions in libya... but that is the only thing he "did" that I can think to critique him for, rather than what he "didn't do" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YSR_Racer_99 Posted August 1, 2012 Report Share Posted August 1, 2012 First off jeff, Fast n furious is a program that dates back to bush... (although it has changed names) so take that second amendment threat and back it up a little bit.It was referenced more to illustrate that the Obama (capitalized) admin tried to use it as a tool to make guns look evil, and to further an anti-gun agenda. Its generally accepted that Holder and his assigns refused to remove or track weapons that they knew were coming back across the border. This didn't happen under the Bush (capitalized) admin. It was begun under them, but as a different program. "As a person who leans more liberal regarding social and personal freedom issues, I blame Obama more for his in-actions than for his actions. He could've worked to crank back the patriot act, he could've worked to get Gitmo closed and dismantled, but maybe he was busy trying to get the crumbled financial sector back into functioning order...I'm not a fan of his actions in libya... but that is the only thing he "did" that I can think to critique him for, rather than what he "didn't do" "Which illustrates my point, I think. Libs are angry at him for dragging his feet, especially when he controlled both Houses early-on. They're angry at him for not taking full advantage of all of that power, and not advancing their agenda like he promised-to during the campaign. End the wars, close Gitmo, unemployment not going below 8%. Getting the crumbled financial sector back into functioning order by blaming the Wall Streeters on one hand, but taking their contributions with the other. By not forcing GE to pay any taxes on its billions in profits. By giving GM and Chrysler tons of OUR money which they'll never have to pay back. By handing out millions to "green technologies" which failed in short order (and the CEO's will not be held accountable nor investigated). Happens on both sides of the ideological coin. But conservatives don't make movies and write books about killing Obama. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.