I think I agree fully with what you said, and also that the provocative Indiana law drew us back into the grey sumpwaters of church vs. state sanction and never should have been attempted. But that's what that very law's purpose was - for a group of "victimized" Christians to re-assert even just a small amount of state-sponsored discrimination to help get back their nation, right in line with the "We are a Christian-founded nation, by God's will" argument. It's "Jim Crow" in different clothes. I can be tolerant (to a degree) with another person's backwardness, but not when it's state-sponsored, which is what that (first version of the) law edged into. As a side note, I can't express how grateful I am for the reasonableness this past year or so's dialogue between O.R. members has been. What I see on many other forums truly depresses me about the state of humanity.