Jump to content

smccrory

Members
  • Posts

    2,575
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    11

Everything posted by smccrory

  1. Really? That's not at all what I had on my 85 CB700SC's CV cluster.
  2. Yep, that's where the push-pull cable from the throttle ring goes to the butterfly valves. As you know, CV carbs don't have cable lifters at the top of the carbs - their slides are vacuum actuated to better smooth out fast throttle changes by fueling only according to the actual airflow (though they're still not as good as measured and mapped fuel injection). So, yep, he bought a victim of sexual assault. Lol and it's both a soft tail and a sprung pan seat. Poor thing will most likely never run well now that the airbox is gone. You need harmonic dampening and equalization of the air supply to optimize CV systems. But you already know that!
  3. Um no, the butterfly valves are not the chokes nor the slides nor the bystarter valves on a CV carb. I bet those are the same hacks who pull pipes and airboxes, put on short shots and pinecone filters and then dump the molested, shit-running bike on CL with "ran great before winter - will be awesome after a quick carb tune." [emoji21]
  4. No argument there. I'll need to give her a shower and a scrub soon.
  5. So that wasn't you I passed on Rt. 3 headed north for 90 minutes of gear-testing fun?
  6. And this one look unmolested. I test rode a Virago last spring for a buddy, and it was the worst turd I've had the displeasure of mounting, and that guy wanted $1200!
  7. No sir, that will not be a cheap build! But the quality and accuracy should be outstanding.
  8. Honda's RWB scheme is one of the best color combos anywhere. That is one beautiful bike.
  9. Hey, simplicity has a beauty all its own! One if my favorite rifles is an unmolested Ruger 10/22.
  10. Concidence, but AT&T is getting replaced by Apple in the DJ30 index. A sign of what someone thinks is a better bellwether of a modern market?
  11. Thanks Brian! I'll probably still do my own build, but soon enough I need to buckle down on that CB77. [emoji56]
  12. Well, I was going to build my own but changed my mind and decided my first AR should be pre-built to learn from an already working system. I was then going for a light and simple M&P 15 Sport or a Ruger AR556, but neither were available at the price I wanted. Joe at Vances talked me through my goals, and I settled on a Windham Weaponry SRC with a Vortex StrikerFire II red dot for what I think was a great combo price. It was more than I wanted to spend, but still a lot less than these things are under ban threat, so I feel pretty good about it.
  13. Could be the wireless side doesn't want to be the next in line for new regulations. It's a funny thing - when an industry acts like a bunch of douchebags, they're more likely to be given new regulations to follow. Could be AT&T's wizening up to the dynamic.
  14. That's a valid concern. In fact, .223 is already getting gobbled up out of fear of ammo shortages all over again. And that of course will bring on those very shortages, but I can't blame anyone for hoarding. It's a long-running joke that Barack is the world's greatest (civilian) gun salesman ever, but it has to be seriously true by now. Had I been smart, I would have invested heavily in arms 8 years ago to take profits when the scares are the worst, though there's always the risk that your stock will suddenly become illegal for you to resell I guess. Anyway, I picked up my first AR and 1000 rds of ammo tonight, simply because I could, and they're fun shooters. I was on the fence prior to the 855 ban, but that sealed it for me. Thanks for the motivation Mr. Prez!
  15. Very nice! I want that chef's knife so bad...
  16. Sounds like it's coming along! Pictures will be mandatory of course.
  17. {nerd}What is this "sports" thing of which you people speak?{/nerd}
  18. I'm no expert either but I know my shoulder hurts a lot more from a 30-06 or 7.62x54R.
  19. As an owner of a hideously ugly V-Strom, I take no offense whatsoever! She's pretty in my eyes for her capability, comfort and low operating expenses. She's kind of a magic carpet to new experiences to me. I think you have it spot on.
  20. A few thinks you can do about the M855 ban: https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/stop-batfe-banning-xm855-ammunition/XrvVh1cj And better yet I received this from LEPD's main training guy: Last November this administration closed the last lead smelting plant in America. They used EPA regulation to close all lead smelting plants in America calling lead a hazardous material, this was step one in attempting to create gun control through ammunition manufacturing. They put thousands of Americans out of work while creating an ammunition shortage along with creating outrageous pricing for ammunition. Make no mistake, this is a very thought-out plan which has been discussed within this administration since 2008. The thought process is to take ammunition out of circulation or make it so costly that the normal person cannot afford it. They are now moving forward with another step of this plan and they are using more administrative policy. This time through the BATF to ban a type of ammunition used in the most common rifle. This is referred to as the M855 Ammo Ban calling it armor-piercing. There are other rounds of ammunition on the chopping block after this ban. The plan is to chip away at the available ammunition lists until they have virtually banned most rounds of ammunition. This will be followed by a push to institute the Small Arms Treaty, if you do not know what this is, please research it and what it has done around the globe. We are the last nation that belongs to the United Nations where the citizens can own firearms. We are losing more and more rights everyday by an administration using policy to change laws and create bans. If people do not take a stand now, there will be nothing left. Please take the time and contact your representatives and follow the below instructions to let this administration know you are aware of their plans. Please do not do nothing. We are losing one of our God given rights and it is being done through illegal methods. Speak up now before we lose it all !!! The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives announced on Friday their intent to ban some common flavors of AR-15 ball ammo, ostensibly because of its “armor piercing” capability. You have until March 15 to register comments with the ATF on the move. Instructions for how to do that can be found here. Pro tip: for maximum effectiveness, keep it simple, clear and cogent. Below you will find an example of talking points for your letter. Gentlemen – BATFE does not have any statutory authority to prohibit civilian distribution or possession of U.S. M855 specification cartridges under 18 U.S.C. 921 (a) (17) (B), regardless of any ‘sporting purpose’ determination. Nor does BATFE have any statutory authority to prohibit civilian distribution or possession of NATO STANAG 4172 specification cartridges under 18 U.S.C. 921 (a) (17) (B), again regardless of any ‘sporting purpose’ determination. The statutory language supposedly authorizing such a prohibition, cited by Denise Brown on Page 3 of the BATFE text titled “ATF FRAMEWORK FOR DETERMINING WHETHER CERTAIN PROJECTILES ARE “PRIMARILY INTENDED FOR SPORTING PURPOSES” WITHIN THE MEANING OF 18 U.S.C. 921 (a) (17) ©”, reads: (B) The term “armor piercing ammunition” means - a projectile or projectile core which may be used in a handgun and which is constructed entirely (excluding the presence of traces of other substances) from one or a combination of tungsten alloys, steel, iron, brass, bronze, beryllium copper, or depleted uranium; or a full jacketed projectile larger than .22 caliber designed and intended for use in a handgun and whose jacket has a weight of more than 25 percent of the total weight of the projectile. The projectile specified in M855 specification ammunition, U.S. Army TACOM ARDEC Drawing 9342869, has a combined steel and lead metal core. 18 U.S.C. 921 (a) (17) (B) (i) applies only to projectile cores: ….constructed entirely (excluding the presence of traces of other substances) from one or a combination of tungsten alloys, steel, iron, brass, bronze, beryllium copper, or depleted uranium…. The core of the M855 projectile is not constructed entirely of steel, nor is the steel in the core of the M855 projectile combined with “tungsten alloys, steel, iron, brass, bronze, beryllium copper, or depleted uranium”. Rather, the steel in the projectile core of TACOM ARDEC Drawing 9342869 bullet is at the front of a lead metal component. These two components together, both within the projectile jacket, constitute the M855 projectile core. You can confirm this combination by reviewing U.S. Army TACOM ARDEC Drawing 9349656, which establishes the engineering requirements for the M855 projectile core. Please note the English language definition of the adverb ‘entirely’, as taken from Merriam-Webster: Definition of ENTIRELY 1 : to the full or entire extent : completely <I agree entirely> <you are entirely welcome> 2 : to the exclusion of others : solely <entirely by my own efforts> By any correct reading of the English language, the core of the M855 projectile is not composed entirely of steel, or a combination of steel with any of the other metals specified in 18 U.S.C. 921 (a) (17) (B) (i). 18 U.S.C. 921 (a) (17) (B) (ii) applies only to projectiles larger than .22 caliber, designed and intended for a handgun, so the jacket weight percentage of the .22 caliber M855 projectile is not legally relevant to a determination of the M855 cartridge’s status as ‘armor piercing ammunition’. Also MIL-C-63989C (AR), the U.S. Army specification covering M855 cartridges, does not mention handguns. Further, the gas port pressure requirements established in Section 3.10.3 of MIL-C-63989C (AR) constructively exclude the ‘AR Type handguns’ cited in Denise Brown’s text as an application for M855 cartridges. Before an 18 U.S.C. 921 (a) (17) © ‘sporting purposes’ exemption can be considered, BATFE must establish that the projectiles in M855 cartridges are indeed subject to ‘armored piercing ammunition’ regulation under 18 U.S.C. 921 (a) (17) (B). BATFE has not made this case, nor can BATFE make this case without abusing the clear statutory language. Please withdraw Denise Brown’s “ATF FRAMEWORK FOR DETERMINING WHETHER CERTAIN PROJECTILES ARE “PRIMARILY INTENDED FOR SPORTING PURPOSES” WITHIN THE MEANING OF 18 U.S.C. 921 (a) (17) ©” and terminate any further efforts to prohibit civilian possession or distribution of M855 projectiles and/or cartridges. Please extend all of these comments to cover any and all cartridges conforming to NATO STANAG 4172, which are functionally and constructively identical to U.S. Army M855 cartridges. Your Name Thank You, Be Elite Tactical Training of Ohio www.bettoh.com 614-370-5031 This email message contains information that may be confidential, be protected by other applicable privileges, or constitute non-public information, it may contain governmental classified information intended solely for the listed receipt. This email may not be copied, forwarded or duplicated without express permission from the sender. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, please notify the sender and then delete it. Use, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this message by unintended recipients is not authorized and may lead to prosecution.
  21. Ditto to silentcropduster. This could be cool, but I doubt ill afford it.
  22. The Dayton show is bigger and better, but Westland is still worth $9 once in a while. I think of it as entertainment similar to a movie ticket or motorcycle museum trip. Sometimes I come away without buying anything, sometimes with a new toy, sometimes with something unexpected, sometimes learning something, and always with a better sense of what's selling and current prices. Beats being cooped up all winter. [emoji4]
  23. Very nice! Love the size of the leek. That bone handle is really unique - you rarely see bone on a folder any more. You're much further along in your collection than I am.
  24. Thanks! They're no longer made and really hard to find, so I guess some folks are gouging on the price but I got mine for less than half that. I couldn't believe I found one in a gun show case among hundreds of synthetic knives. I was just about to get a mini-griptillian until this one locked my eyes.
  25. I'll go first. Yesterday I ran across a Kershaw 1480 Nakamura that I just couldn't leave in the case. It has a 2.88 inch clad Japanese VG10 steel blade, Mokume bolsters (19 layers of stainless, copper and brass) and a 3.88 inch Quince Burlwood handle. Has a perfectly offset removable clip, measures 6.75 inches open and weighs 3.2 oz. The blade is wicked sharp and the centering dead-on. I won't use this knife for hard tasks but will probably make it my main carry folder for a while.
×
×
  • Create New...