i dont see anything wrong with what he was saying. i also got the point after the first time he said it even though he had to say it 25 different ways so that maddow cound hear every possible answer and still not get it; she doesnt seem to understand the concept of no gov't intervention. anyway, he was making the point that gov't should have no say in how an individual runs his/her business. the civil rights act should only apply to gov't buildings and not infringe on the private business owner. that being said, what do you think would happen to the business if they participated in racist policies.....no business. furthermore, i consider racism to be a gross form of ignorance and puts everyone in a position in which no one wins, which seems to be what Rand was saying. so, it seems that the only thing that is happening here is that the left is getting a head start at trying to thwart Rands' success in winning the seat in November. and so it goes, politics as usual and the losers are.....we, the people. we could use some good libertarians right about now.