Todd#43

BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH.....

Holy Shit! That suit could only be delivered by a fairy!! What the fuck did you run over? Bozo the Clown? Tammy Fae Baker?? The zebra suit had a real case of the ghey, but this one takes the cake. What's next, the skittles bike?

Interesting.....

Well, there ya go. It was still the big bad car's fault.

Awww....come on. Its fun, isnt it?

OOohhhh...they're "serious" about riding fast AND building choppers.... Looks like they got a head start on the demolition derby to me. Just ask any Harley rider and they will tell you " Never use the front brake,, it will toss you over the bars" That's why they have those big giant bars....keeps 'em from getting thrown over.

Gear? We are the Harley Riders! We have loud pipes an giant sized handle bars! We don't need no stinking gear!!

I added the proper emphasis for ya. You're right, due to the lack of information in the article we DON'T know the answers. The 60 year old man might not have been riding a 'busa at 200 MPH with a burnt out headlight. The speed to distance ration for him not to be seen by the driver may well have been far less. You seem to be quite certain that the driver of the car is at fault, yet you have no facts to back this up. Answer me this: Do you know how fast the rider of the motorcycle was going? Do you know anything about the topography of the area of the intersection in question? Do you know what type of bike the rider was riding? Do you know if the headlight was ON (as required by law) Were there any other conditions that could have affected the driver's visibility? (traveling from west to east? Sun? Physical obstructions at said intersection?) Unless you can answer those questions your assumption has no basis in fact, and becomes merely an opinion. Quit trying to justify it by citing traffic code. Everyone knows you're supposed to stop at a stop sign.

Says the guy with the GIANT handlebars on the bike (yeah, those not only LOOK cool, but they give you excellent control over your 800 lb bike) I'm guessing it went something like this http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-ZFpIpaFMlc Oh yeah, I giggled when I read it too...

How about this? http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=110131 How deep does it go?

I knew that. Just trying to help you out!

Marginally

So, if the rider was traveling at a high rate of speed (to the point where said rider was not visible when she entered the intersection) it was the cage's fault? If it was dark, and the rider was traveling without a headlight and couldn't be seen by the driver, it was the driver's fault? Certainly I'm not disparaging the rider but there are at least TWO instances where the driver of the car would not be at fault, and your statement has no basis in fact - legally, technically, or otherwise.

THAT was funny.

Pacers and Pistons as I recall. Maybe its because the NBA has fewer athletes than the NFL or MLB it just seems like they have more than their fair share?

Because we ALL know you can't handle a bigboy bike...

It would seem that the NBA has their share of thugs for sure. Of course, the NFL and MLB seem to have their share too. Perhaps its more of a social commentary as opposed to a problem with a particular sport?

Time will tell. Really though, its just another example of a "privileged" person thinking the rules dont apply to him (ala Plaxico)

He's a fuggin retard. Just another NBA thug http://msn.foxsports.com/nba/story/10090920/Cavs-guard-arrested-with-shotgun,-two-handguns

Now it makes a difference WHAT he called him? Would it have been ok if he called him an asshole? The asking the president what he thought of it was ridiculous in the first place. Beyond that, he could have said "what he did was rude", or "his actions were inappropriate". Either statement would have conveyed the same thought without stooping to that level.

Here you go... Obamacorn explained in a way that everyone can understand it (yes, even you, JRMii) http://biggovernment.com/2009/09/17/once-upon-an-acorn-why-acorns-internal-audit-is-a-sham/ S'ok, you can all thank me later.