Uncle Punk

It's a joke, not real, fake. Good one though, believable because he does say some ridiculous things just not this.

The Rev. Al Sharpton held a press conference today to blast Tiger Woods for the lack of diversity among his mistresses. Sharpton claims that the lack of African-American women among Woods’ harem will have a negative affect on the black community, specifically young black girls. “Why is it that a man who calls himself black can’t bring himself to cheat on his wife with a black woman?” said Sharpton, speaking to a group of supporters in Harlem . “What does it say to young black girls everywhere when you pass them over? Shame on you, Tiger Woods. What would your daddy say?” Sharpton, who has long championed taking black women as mistresses, said that today’s black athletes need to stop neglecting black women when it comes to extramarital affairs, and should follow the examples of positive black role models such as Jesse Jackson and Martin Luther King, Jr., both of whom cheated on their wives with black women. Sharpton also stressed that cheating with African- American women would help the black community financially by giving black girls the chance to sell their stories to tabloids and gossip magazines. Added Sharpton, “I’m not asking you to stop cheating on your wives, I’m just asking you to give back to your own community.”

http://www.kmbc.com/news/21913569/detail.html See video on right side of page.

Well my mommy thinks so anyway. I would be out there rockin a 600 but quite honestly I don't think I could handle a 1000 out there and it scares me a little. If I would do it with the street bike I'm thinking intermediate, to keep me from being sucked into a situation over my head.

You'll like me I'm cool as hell. No track bike this year wish I could do it. I will not be using my street bike. I seem to wreck about every other time I'm at the track. I wrecked the last time so this time should be good but my new street bike is too fast for me to handle on the track at my skill level.

The World Series doesn't involve the world, so what. If these kids are going to be making millions for the colleges shouldn't they be paid? They have a talent that is worth millions but jeopardize it playing for a college for free or a 160k education. Don't get me started on not giving scholarships to those producing the most revenue for the schools. Making it fair for the girl’s volleyball team to get scholarships has made it unfair for those who actually contribute to the college making money. The whole system is fucked up, so what, congress has no business managing it. DC should be doing their jobs, national defense and infrastructure.

This thread has taken too many turns since I last looked at it. Once again I blame Justin for fucking it all up, now it would take me a very long time to make all the comments I want to make. Fuck that shit I have work to do. I agree with Gixies premise but don't agree with any of his logic behind it. This conversation has expanded into other topics in the same way religion is enter twined with all aspects of life just as money and politics are. I am now unable to move on to the other topics because I haven't been able to change everyone else’s mind to match mine on the OP. This does not work for me you are all supposed to listen to me and bend to my will. Quit having original thoughts and moving things along at your own pace, it is getting very frustrating.

Taxing all value added vehicles equally will not prohibit free exercise of it. This is a slippery slope I agree that is why I don't like seeing taxes used as punishment or reward. If all religions or churches were taxed equally nothing has been prohibited. We have freedom to choose how we worship and our government is not allowed to impose a national religion. We don't keep religious values out of our laws just because they have a tie to religion. Thou shalt not kill is a sound social law with far reaching social consequences. We don't ignore the fact that such a law has value just because a religion has used it as part of their teachings. Taxing churches will give them no more power in government than any other social group has. As a practical sense it's hard to get two religions to agree with each other one will not dominate the political landscape unless crusade tactics are implemented. People get what kind of government they want or deserve based on their input. If teachings from religion make it into our laws it's not because they come from religion it's because they are wise intelligent social rules that are necessary for large populations of people to get along. If religion didn't exist most social laws would still be here because of experience living with the results of actions that can't be sustained. Religion doesn't have the market on morality cornered they have just marketed it better.

My vote is yes. Any money I spend after it has already been taxed is subject to being taxed again, I don't see that as an argument here. If I buy a ticket to a movie the money the theater makes for entertaining me is taxed nothing is produced. People utilizing the services a church provides drive on our roads, use the improvements to the property, have the safety services at their disposal all made possible by our taxes why should they get to have a service provided for them off of our backs? I don't like our current tax structure but I don't like to see it applied as a tool to punish or reward different groups of people. I hate the Amish fucks freeloading off of our backs in the name of religion. If you are going to reap the rewards of our society you should contribute to them. Draft dodging scum sucking leaches is all they are. A personal one man (woman) tax would be the fairest tax possible to implement but you couldn't punish the rich by charging them more with it or reward the underachievers by reducing it so it will never fly. I don't mind paying taxes for national defense and infrastructure these are things that benefit us all. If I can stop paying taxes I would be in a better financial situation, if all of us stopped paying taxes none of our standards of living would change because prices for goods would adjust. Yes I do believe charities should be taxed also. I have worked for toys for tots and give a decent percentage of my income to charities also including a church.

^ True story My girlfriend has five dogs, now I think dogs are cool and all but to me five are too many but it makes her happy. She could care less about a motorcycle but appears to be happy for me when I get another one; she even went with me to 95% of my races as pit help. We’ve been together fourteen years, I plan to keep her. If this girl couldn't be happy for you when you found pleasure in something she isn't worth trying to keep around.

Read the book, “The millionaire next door”. I personally know several people who are worth millions and no one would know it by the things they show. It is meaningless what possessions you show. In fact I have found it to be quite the opposite of people with true wealth.

Fuck her sister!

That's racist.

^ Oh no you don't I'm on to your ways. You need to be more subtle.

I have told him not to be so subtle when joking around; I'm kind of slow on the uptake. Good one though because it got me, I understand doing it, I troll from time to time.

http://chronicle.northcoastnow.com/2007/11/16/tasered-woman-pleads-no-contest/#comments Follow up to the video posted earlier. I left it out for my own entertainment purposes, worked out for me; I can’t buy that kind of entertainment. I don't think the taser is that evil, if used properly it's an effective tool. In the scenario above I think it wasn't applied correctly. The grandma deployment from a few months back I thought it was applied correctly. The fat dumb fuck that deployed it above should not have been on the force to begin with, in my opinion. I highly doubt he could pass a PFT, if he was an example of typical law enforcement I don't know how others in the profession can be proud of the profession if that fat dumb fuck can't be culled out it makes the whole lot not seem quite so worthy of respect. I am respectful of law enforcement but don't hold them with any higher regard than anyone else. I think it's a job I would be able to do quite easily if I wanted to force myself to have daily contact with the masses. I couldn't be a teacher for much of the same reasons plus I wasn't going to be able to make it through a higher education, I barely made it through high school. I have never needed law enforcement in my life and can't picture a scenario where I would. This is not to say I haven't had contact with them. I have gotten tickets and been in accidents where they have been present. The fat dumb fuck from above could have handled these situations; they are not exactly hard tasks to work through. The folks at the water department perform similar tasks while at their jobs. I can defend myself no help needed thanks. If there is a hostage situation with multiple bad guys call in the military. Now those guys are necessary. I am prior military so I am biased; just as I'm sure those in law enforcement are going to be biased with their replies. I understand that I have simplified the tasks that law enforcement performs. If they had a yearly PFT and fired those who couldn’t cut it that might make them a cut above or if the standards where the same for men and women. (Unions aren’t going to let that happen.)Serving a warrant to commit a violent mental patient is a call that shouldn’t be handled by a fat out of shape old man; it jeopardizes the success of the mission. This is a hard task to get accomplished and one I am thankful we have able bodied law enforcement to perform. Domestic disturbances are something else I am thankful to have law enforcement there for, a woman usually can’t defend herself from a man. This is another necessary task that most can’t accomplish so I see value to having law enforcement. When you have the majority of peoples contact with law enforcement being negative with tasks that can be performed by paper pushers it’s hard to demand respect for the whole lot.

I didn't think I was but this was commented on more for the people who think the 12 hours isn't enough. I think it shouldn't be required at all and is a waste of time to make it mandatory. Alaska and Vermont have no such mandatory indoctrination scheme with very little fallout. I don't understand why people think others in our own state don't have the ability to do the same.

I remember being quite annoyed having to take the stupid mandatory 12 hours of learnin to get my license, what a waste of time. I did it but asking for permission to defend myself just seems wrong, for me or anyone else. I carried prior to this latest licensing scheme and no one was harmed. I went through the license process with the mindset that it could minimize my time spent with government officials if I would somehow need to defend my life.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KWaCD6jIH5Q&feature=player_embedded

Really a long time ago but CJ (KTMRIDER's brother. KTM450) just got this to me and I tryed to post my first youtube video from it. I posted three from the dvd I got from him but this is the only one that worked, kinda. The audio was disabled. One was too long and the other one is just for scene selections. Maybe someday I'll get the hang of it. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=55kTdlCA8C4&feature=channel

This could possibly be the dumbest statement in this whole thread. I don't see why I can't be cool because I carry what's wrong with being cool? You guys WAY over think things.

Very nice I am starting to look for a G26. I hate the way they feel in my hands but I seem to shoot more accurately with them. I am currently carrying a Kahr PM9 with seven rounds. Thinking of going to the G26 with eleven rounds and a guide rod laser.