Someday, you'll wish you owned these cars.

[Dr. Pomade]

At least that's what some people at CNN Money say:

 

http://autos.yahoo.com/news/someday--you-ll-wish-you-owned-these-cars.html?page=1

 

#8 = :megusta:

[RyM3rC]

Oh shit, the TT RS is on there. In before Jones.

 

I wish I owned most of those cars TOday, let alone SOMEday.

[iwashmycar]

 

I wish I owned most of those cars TOday, let alone SOMEday.

 

my thoughts exactly

[AudiOn19s]

No M3 on this list???

[POS VETT]

I already own one of them ...

[Brrcats]

I dont think there will ever be a day when I think, "man, I really wish I had owned that buick regal"

[Jackson1647545504]

meh ...

[Not Brian]

BRB INVESTING IN $62,000 SUV FOR FUTURE RETURNS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

what a crock of shit.

[CRed05]

Buick Regal only in it's European, AWD form.

 

Camaro :dumb:

 

Jeep :dumb:

[copperhead]

man, car prices are out of control. Didn't C5's sell new in the $50,000 range? Now it takes that much money to get an optioned out camaro with the mustang right on its heels.

[POS VETT]

A base C5 was in low $40k's. Loaded Z06 and 'verts were pushing $50k and maybe slightly over.

[Aaron]

Zl1, laguna seca, golf r, ttrs, sure, the others? No

[Dr. Pomade]

Zl1, laguna seca, golf r, ttrs, sure, the others? No

 

GT-R no?

 

Am I taking crazy pills?

[Got-Boost?]

Camaro, Charger, Regal, Fiat, Jeep,.....WTF...uh NO!

[motozachl]

I dont think there will ever be a day when I think, "man, I really wish I had owned that buick regal"

 

:lolguy:

[KillJoy]

That list is dumb.

 

KillJoy

[TTQ B4U]

CNN Money

 

CNN Money promoting cars as something people should put their money towards. Irony at it's finest.

[AWW$HEEET]

no e30 no care

[Draco-REX]

This 470-horsepower Jeep with track-tuned suspension may not get far off-road, but it'll easily beat most SUVs on the pavement.

If they could have summed up why NOT to buy this car in one sentence, this would be it. it's a *Jeep* that sucks off-road, and they compare its performance against other overweight, over-sized, SUVs.

 

It's like saying "This Camaro might not win a drag race, but it's easily faster than your grandma's Buick!"

[zeitgeist57]

I'm surprised the Abarth 500 is an interesting pick...maybe future value like a Dodge Omni GLHS?

[Rocky31186]

Jeep h8ers LOL

[stangsn95gt]

no e30 no care

 

:fuckyeah:

[kirks5oh]

zl1 is not even out yet, and they have it on the list??

 

 

SRT8 cherokee is slower than the outgoing version. lots of hypotheticals on there.

 

list does make me want to get a GTR or 911 turbo as my next toy.

[Rocky31186]

The list isn't about how fast they are, or what they look like. Its talking about how they're limited production and in the future will be valuable. I'm sure people back in the 60's and 70's didn't think any of the new cars that were coming out were going to be valuable 20 years later. And look at some of them bringing in $100k.

 

So just because you wouldn't own one. Doesn't mean it's not going to be worth more down the road when they stop production.

[AudiOn19s]

The list isn't about how fast they are, or what they look like. Its talking about how they're limited production and in the future will be valuable. I'm sure people back in the 60's and 70's didn't think any of the new cars that were coming out were going to be valuable 20 years later. And look at some of them bringing in $100k.

 

So just because you wouldn't own one. Doesn't mean it's not going to be worth more down the road when they stop production.

 

I get where you're going with this but there are maybe 2-3 cars on that list that might actually fit based on that logic.

 

Special edition doesn't necessarily equal limited production these days. PLUS they put a regular-ass 911 on there, says it doesn't matter what model. Look at 996 values, they produced soo many of them they're not worth squat these days....well the GT3's still are