Uncle Punk

For the record I think it would be retarded to make a licensing system like mentioned above and thought it sounded so ridiculous that no sane person would take it seriously. I think our schooling & testing system for CHL is unnecessary, intrusive, ineffective and should be done away with. I think one is foolish to not be informed of the current laws but being stupid shouldn't be regulated. Your desire to regulate our rights even more than they are now is unfounded based on evidence of other states having no licensing system. Why would you suggest such a thing when it is clear that it isn't needed?

Several states do not require "permission" to conceal carry as it should be everywhere. Chaos does not take place in these states. Self-defense is a human right and never should have been regulated in the first place. Being competent is not the government’s responsibility. They can punish you if you cause harm as necessary. I can send this into all kinds of different levels of competency debate that would take this into many tangents so how about a motorcycle one. I say no one should be able to ride a motorcycle on the street until they have earned their expert road racing license. There is no way anyone can know how to handle a motorcycle on the road unless they have reached this level of training. Sorry cruiser, scooter, touring riders you can never reach the level of competent motorcycle riding. I know this is a poor example because riding isn't a protected right but the slippery slope follows the same path.

We don't know each other so don't take this wrong. You can take this stupid fucking idea and shove it up your ass. If you need the government to hold your hand to make decisions go for it but free people should do all they can to keep the government from regulating a constitutional right. Preaching this looney lefty bullshit won't endear you to free thinking people.

So you're saying that if you lift the feed tray it will stop a runaway feed or will it cause a cook-off that sends shrapnel into everyone around?

I have been trying to stay away from posting in this thread, it has enough stupid that it doesn't need me but this is so interesting I need to learn more. When you say melt do you mean it turns into a liquid pile of mush? Will a hot barrel cause a cook-off? What do you do with a jammed gun that is hot with rounds in it? We need to know these things and be trained so we can carry a magazine feed 33 round sidearm for self defense. I see your point and wish the rest of these dumbfucks would shut up long enough to learn something.

Similar situations have happened to me or groups I've been riding with more times than I can remember. (Pickup truck every time.) The last one would have ended ugly if the sheriff’s department hadn't been waiting for the whole group at the next stop. Bikes lose every time in a pure vehicle confrontation and I assume everyone else is armed also. I do understand being pushed to the "fuck it" stage and wanting to go for it anyway but it’s a good way to ruin a ride.

You carry a plastic handgun in a plastic holster, 10/22 with a wood stock works fine but isn't cool enough? WTF is wrong with you? Prejudice much? I say this thread gets moved to R&R & we ban the offender until he can fully embrace the superiority of polymer.

I needed to check to see if I was being ignored and just knew what would draw a response. Thanks for restoring my faith in grammar Nazis; they are one group that can be depended upon to not be able to control their affliction.

I hope you guys appreciate how hard it was for me to make that last post. It took me several tries.

I will not be ignored. Your not going to get away with this, I would rather you ignore me then correct my mistakes.

Did I just get banned?

Same rules different enforcement? I understand how that's not confusing and makes sense. Once again I would like to request mod status so I can post in closed threads and ban any of the pussy complainers that want to ruin the R&R section.

We have gone through this before I'm sure but I am still not clear about this. What rules a different in the R&R section from the main site?

Yeah I was there so I have a clue about the sequence of events. Am I to get the impression that he could have made the post he did in the R&R section without any infractions?

I quoted him for a reason. I will bitch like a little girl if the jack booted thugs modify my posts. I don't have a problem with his language and have maintained all along that a section where you could say anything would be where I spend most of my time. I participate in a forum with no rules and it is much easier to get rid of dumbfucks when you can relate to them in a manner in which they can understand. If you are just a loud mouth without any substance behind you I guarantee you will be very frustrated by the time you leave. Those that remain actually are very interesting and it becomes a very well behaved site not the chaos you might expect. I wish I would have gotten the opportunity to converse with our banned thread starter I bet I would have been able to make his head explode but over moderation is preventing that from happening. I don't understand why there is an R&R section when the same main site rules apply.

Now this is how to get a thread moved. I wonder how this will go over on such a heavily moderated site?

If you are bracket racing with a sand bagger time and find yourself winning but fear you might break out do not grab a handful of brakes at speed. Bad things happen.

Yes, I'm saying that this election cycle if he has decided to seek the republican nomination he should be loyal to the party he was pretending to represent for giving him the opportunity for exposure. That has nothing to do with seeking a job that you aren't representing people or asking them for support to get that job. If he wants to be president at any cost why doesn't he also usurp himself into the democrat nominee process at the same time? Twice the exposure and he could still run as an independent when he isn't taken seriously by either party.

You need to explain this a little better for me to understand what you just meant. Maybe I'm getting your point and the parties shouldn't have a nominee process at all just a general election where as many candidates that wanted to run should be the choices. If RP believes that is the best way to go then why bother with pretending and lying to all of us that he is a republican? Deciding to seek the republican nomination, when that doesn't work out for him he changes his stripes to run as an independent. I see such a move as not making him much different than all of the other lying politicians. It certainly doesn't make him stand out from the lying crowd as a better candidate, just another one that will lie and deceive to obtain the goal he desires. I think we should expect much better. (Not that we are getting better with our other options.) Now this is all speculation, when he loses the republican nomination and decides to run as an independent will the name calling be earned. I can't believe his supporters would want him to be such a two faced loser.

There's not a chance I came even close to saying that. I'm saying that you have had your chance to vote for RP this election cycle unless he is a complete douche and runs as an independent. If he has been using the republican nominating process to gain name recognition for the purpose of running as an independent all along he is a spineless fuck that hasn't been truthful to any of us. I find that to be a less than desirable person to consider as a viable prospect for a vote. I really like RP and agree with him on 99% of his platform. Most of them are about things that the government shouldn't have been involved in at all to begin with. One of the few things that the government should be involved in is national defense and he is so wrong about that it isn't even worth thinking about voting for him. I think he would have made a fine independent candidate but he missed that opportunity as soon as he decided to run for the republican nomination. If you think that means I think you should be loyal to the Republican Party you need to take a step back and evaluate your fan boy status because it is blinding you and making it hard for me to take you serious.