Uncle Punk

Yes, I'm saying that this election cycle if he has decided to seek the republican nomination he should be loyal to the party he was pretending to represent for giving him the opportunity for exposure. That has nothing to do with seeking a job that you aren't representing people or asking them for support to get that job. If he wants to be president at any cost why doesn't he also usurp himself into the democrat nominee process at the same time? Twice the exposure and he could still run as an independent when he isn't taken seriously by either party.

You need to explain this a little better for me to understand what you just meant. Maybe I'm getting your point and the parties shouldn't have a nominee process at all just a general election where as many candidates that wanted to run should be the choices. If RP believes that is the best way to go then why bother with pretending and lying to all of us that he is a republican? Deciding to seek the republican nomination, when that doesn't work out for him he changes his stripes to run as an independent. I see such a move as not making him much different than all of the other lying politicians. It certainly doesn't make him stand out from the lying crowd as a better candidate, just another one that will lie and deceive to obtain the goal he desires. I think we should expect much better. (Not that we are getting better with our other options.) Now this is all speculation, when he loses the republican nomination and decides to run as an independent will the name calling be earned. I can't believe his supporters would want him to be such a two faced loser.

There's not a chance I came even close to saying that. I'm saying that you have had your chance to vote for RP this election cycle unless he is a complete douche and runs as an independent. If he has been using the republican nominating process to gain name recognition for the purpose of running as an independent all along he is a spineless fuck that hasn't been truthful to any of us. I find that to be a less than desirable person to consider as a viable prospect for a vote. I really like RP and agree with him on 99% of his platform. Most of them are about things that the government shouldn't have been involved in at all to begin with. One of the few things that the government should be involved in is national defense and he is so wrong about that it isn't even worth thinking about voting for him. I think he would have made a fine independent candidate but he missed that opportunity as soon as he decided to run for the republican nomination. If you think that means I think you should be loyal to the Republican Party you need to take a step back and evaluate your fan boy status because it is blinding you and making it hard for me to take you serious.

That made no sense at all if he was trying to defend the position that RP should be able to flip-flop and run as an independent when he doesn't get the republican nomination.

So he is a Republican and won't abandon his roots to run as an independent?

Why would he run for the republican nomination if he is an independent unless he is a spineless two faced asshole with no core or soul?

How are you voting for him? The primary is already over in Ohio.

I agree that we are fucked either way and find Romney to be the worst possible choice in my lifetime for a Republican nominee. (I go back to the first Reagan election.) I will not abstain from voting but only because of Supreme Court nominees and even then I'm not so sure we won't get another Kennedy. (Reagan appointee.)

I hate both of these fuckers http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IWDJEc92d38&feature=player_embedded

I couldn't have said it better myself. Crawl back under your liberal troll rock and take the rest of your ignorant uneducated liberal friends with you. It will be the safest place for you because out here in the open you guys just keep getting punched in the face with the truth.

Damn peanut butter rule. Apparently I owe you $5

Of course I do he has jungle fever

Spicy starfish

I find it funny that when we went into a holster conversation it was moved out of this thread as off topic but butt sex and the gay pornz is left in because it's on topic for this trip. Carry on.

It's good to have a point of reference and impressive that you are that well traveled and learned to regale us with your knowledge. I assumed you would simply describe it as something gross instead of a delicacy.

Hey, what did that shit taste like?

I would definitely replace that tire, that's just not safe. I'll give you $50 for it.

I tried to race in 2008; I don't remember much about the first race except the crazy uncontrollable urge to pee before it started.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=010KyIQjkTk

Who says the internet has too much porn?

I can't believe this but I may have been wrong in one of my earlier replies. It is quite possible that I have been duped by the most cunning troll ever or our new little friend is too ignorant to be made offended. I honestly can't figure it out.

What a pussyfied stand to take, let someone else do it. The police had proven to be inadequate in the area already by the amount of crime that was taking place. (I don't blame the police; property crime shouldn't be a high priority.)This concerned citizen decided that he would be responsible and watch the area. He did call the police and they were still too busy with other business to have someone check out a suspicious person. We don't know what happened next but the existence of a neighborhood watch isn't a point to jump off of for a compelling argument. I'm sorry if you don't have the fortitude to confront someone who you perceive to be a problem, others do, sometimes doing what you think is right isn't easy.

He most certainly was looking for trouble. The reason he was out there doing a community watch was because someone was bringing trouble to the neighborhood. He was trying to prevent any further mischief by letting it be know to the cowards that were causing the issues they weren't doing it in a vacuum. I can't imagine people who were in the area were threatened or bothered by someone looking out for their best interests. If the kid took exception to that and decided that he would confront the concerned citizen by acting like a thug then that’s on him. I would expect that a conversation about whom he knew or why he was there would have made things a lot easier for both of them but that's not what happened. It sounds to me like the kid was looking for trouble just as much as the old man because I doubt the kid was shot for politely replying to a concerned citizen in the neighborhood. He was under no obligation to endure an interrogation for merely existing but having a chip on your shoulder, eluding, confronting or attacking someone is not innocent. I don’t know what happened just as much as any of us debating this but if you are surprised by people who are concerned about their neighborhood and feel that confronting them for being concerned is a proper way to handle yourself don’t be surprised if you don’t like the results of your actions.